From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43512 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729224AbeKXGp5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:45:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:00:11 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Helge Deller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 08/18] parisc: function_graph: Simplify with function_graph_entry() Message-ID: <20181123200011.GM1917@sasha-vm> References: <20181122003332.500796758@goodmis.org> <20181123073033.2083020863@mail.kernel.org> <511cb47a-a1bd-bb5d-69ec-0836c6b5abfe@gmx.de> <20181123121253.278146b4@vmware.local.home> <20181123183415.GB1917@sasha-vm> <20181123142617.3d3972ca@vmware.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181123142617.3d3972ca@vmware.local.home> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 02:26:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:34:15 -0500 >Sasha Levin wrote: > >> Does this mean that someone (Steve) will send a backport of this to all >> relevant stable trees? Right now it looks like the series will randomly >> apply on a mix of trees, which can't be good. > >Nope. I stated that in my 0 patch. That's not good though, if you don't intend for them to be automagically backported to stable trees by Greg, then they shouldn't be tagged at all and if someone is interested then he can provide a backport. What will happen with these is that once Greg's scripts process Linus's tree he'll end up with this patch series inconsistently backported to stable trees, which is not what you want here. Sure, we can wait for the "added to the xyz stable tree" mails and object then, but why risk breaking the trees? -- Thanks. Sasha