From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58828 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728782AbeK3DNR (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 22:13:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:07:22 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Tigran Aivazian Cc: LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , Andrew Morton , willy@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 033/110] bfs: add sanity check at bfs_fill_super() Message-ID: <20181129160722.GA31919@kroah.com> References: <20181129135921.231283053@linuxfoundation.org> <20181129135922.602882966@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, of course I object to it. I ignored this version of the patch > being applied to the older Linux versions, but for the latest versions > surely the version that I have authored should be applied instead. I > have sent to Andrew Morton both the 4.20-rc1 and 4.19.2 versions of > the patch. The 4.20 was applied (as "linux-next", I don't know why it > is not in 4.20-rc4 yet), but 4.19.2 version was not applied yet, so > here it is attached again (with the proper changelog etc). It applies > to 4.19.5 cleanly as well, so please use this version (attached). I can not apply a patch to the stable trees that are not in Linus's tree first. So there's nothing I can do here with this. Until then, I'll take the patch that is already in Linus's tree, which is what I did here, thanks. greg k-h