Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Henrik Austad <haustad@cisco.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	juri.lelli@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com,
	dvhart@infradead.org, bristot@redhat.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Backport rt/deadline crash and the ardous story of FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI to 4.4
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 08:18:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214071826.GE31355@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119112720.GA29334@sisyphus.home.austad.us>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:27:21PM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:35:31AM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Henrik Austad wrote:
> > > From: Henrik Austad <haustad@cisco.com>
> > > 
> > > Short story:
> > 
> > Sorry for the spam, it looks like I was not very specific in /which/ 
> > version I targeted this to, as well as not providing a full Cc-list for the 
> > cover-letter.
> 
> Gentle prod. I realize this was sent out just before plumbers and that 
> people had pretty packed agendas, so a small nudge to gain a spot closer to 
> the top of the inbox :)
> 
> This series has now been running on an arm64 system for 9 days without any 
> issues and pi_stress showed a dramatic improvement from ~30 seconds and up 
> to several ours (it finally deadlocked at 3.9e9 inversions).
> 
> I'd greatly appreciate if someone could give the list of patches a quick 
> glance to verify that I got all the required patches and then if it could 
> be added to 4.4.y.

This is a really intrusive series of patches, and without some testing
and verification by others, I am really reluctant to take these patches.

Why not just move to the 4.9.y tree, or better yet, 4.19.y to resolve
this issue for your systems?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-14  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-09 10:07 [PATCH 00/17] Backport rt/deadline crash and the ardous story of FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI to 4.4 Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/17] futex: Cleanup variable names for futex_top_waiter() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/17] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/17] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/17] rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] futex: Change locking rules Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/17] futex: Cleanup refcounting Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/17] futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/17] futex: Rename free_pi_state() to put_pi_state() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/17] futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lock Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/17] futex,rt_mutex: Introduce rt_mutex_init_waiter() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/17] futex,rt_mutex: Restructure rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/17] futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock() Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 14/17] futex: Futex_unlock_pi() determinism Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 15/17] futex: Drop hb->lock before enqueueing on the rtmutex Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 16/17] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:07 ` [PATCH 17/17] sched/rtmutex/deadline: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks Henrik Austad
2018-11-09 10:35 ` [PATCH 00/17] Backport rt/deadline crash and the ardous story of FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI to 4.4 Henrik Austad
2018-11-19 11:27   ` Henrik Austad
2018-12-14  7:18     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-12-14  7:36       ` Henrik Austad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181214071826.GE31355@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=haustad@cisco.com \
    --cc=henrik@austad.us \
    --cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox