stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patches for v4.4.y, v4.9.y, and v4.14.y to address rbtree test failures
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:06:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214080643.GA12329@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e712ab5-74f6-077e-af82-117f4b856f22@roeck-us.net>

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:22:07PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I recently started seeing spurious test failures with rbtree tests,
> resulting in boot delays and random "hung task" warnings.
> The problems have been fixed upstream with the following patches.
> 
> v4.14.y:
> 
> 0b548e33e6cb lib/rbtree-test: lower default params
> 
> v4.4.y, v4.9.y:
> 
> a54dae0338b7 lib/interval_tree_test.c: make test options module parameters
> c46ecce431eb lib/interval_tree_test.c: allow full tree search

Wait, this patch breaks the build for 4.4.y and 4.9.y, so this isn't
going to work well:

lib/interval_tree_test.c: In function ‘interval_tree_test_init’:
lib/interval_tree_test.c:105:38: error: ‘max_endpoint’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘tracepoint’?
    unsigned long last = search_all ? max_endpoint : queries[j];
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~
                                      tracepoint


So I'm going to drop these from the 4.4 and 4.9 and 3.18 trees.  How did they
build for you?

confused,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-14  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-14  5:22 Patches for v4.4.y, v4.9.y, and v4.14.y to address rbtree test failures Guenter Roeck
2018-12-14  7:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-14  8:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-12-14 14:19   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-17 22:56     ` Sasha Levin
2018-12-18  1:38       ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181214080643.GA12329@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).