From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+4fc427c7af994b0948be@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Edward Cree , Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH 4.19 142/142] bpf: fix off-by-one error in adjust_subprog_starts Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:00:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20181214115752.714813088@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181214115747.053633987@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181214115747.053633987@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Edward Cree commit afd594240806acc138cf696c09f2f4829d55d02f upstream. When patching in a new sequence for the first insn of a subprog, the start of that subprog does not change (it's the first insn of the sequence), so adjust_subprog_starts should check start <= off (rather than < off). Also added a test to test_verifier.c (it's essentially the syz reproducer). Fixes: cc8b0b92a169 ("bpf: introduce function calls (function boundaries)") Reported-by: syzbot+4fc427c7af994b0948be@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -5283,7 +5283,7 @@ static void adjust_subprog_starts(struct return; /* NOTE: fake 'exit' subprog should be updated as well. */ for (i = 0; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++) { - if (env->subprog_info[i].start < off) + if (env->subprog_info[i].start <= off) continue; env->subprog_info[i].start += len - 1; } --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -12511,6 +12511,25 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, }, + { + "calls: ctx read at start of subprog", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 5), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, + .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .result = ACCEPT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)