* [PATCH 1/3] ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device
@ 2018-12-31 19:48 Theodore Ts'o
2019-01-02 14:27 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2018-12-31 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ext4 Developers List; +Cc: Theodore Ts'o, stable
The xfstests generic/475 test switches the underlying device with
dm-error while running a stress test. This results in a large number
of file system errors, and since we can't lock the buffer head when
marking the superblock dirty in the ext4_grp_locked_error() case, it's
possible the superblock to be !buffer_uptodate() without
buffer_write_io_error() being true.
We need to set buffer_uptodate() before we call mark_buffer_dirty() or
this will trigger a WARN_ON. It's safe to do this since the
superblock must have been properly read into memory or the mount would
have been successful. So if buffer_uptodate() is not set, we can
safely assume that this happened due to a failed attempt to write the
superblock.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index d6c142d73d99..fb12d3c17c1b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4902,7 +4902,7 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
if (sync)
lock_buffer(sbh);
- if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh) || !buffer_uptodate(sbh)) {
/*
* Oh, dear. A previous attempt to write the
* superblock failed. This could happen because the
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device
2018-12-31 19:48 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device Theodore Ts'o
@ 2019-01-02 14:27 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-01-02 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, Theodore Ts'o, Ext4 Developers List
Cc: Theodore Ts'o, stable, stable, stable
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0, v4.19.13, v4.14.91, v4.9.148, v4.4.169, v3.18.131,
v4.20.0: Build OK!
v4.19.13: Build OK!
v4.14.91: Build OK!
v4.9.148: Build OK!
v4.4.169: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1566a48aaa10 ("ext4: don't lock buffer in ext4_commit_super if holding spinlock")
4743f8399061 ("ext4: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()")
v3.18.131: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1566a48aaa10 ("ext4: don't lock buffer in ext4_commit_super if holding spinlock")
4743f8399061 ("ext4: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()")
564bc402526e ("ext4, jbd2: add REQ_FUA flag when recording an error in the superblock")
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-02 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-31 19:48 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device Theodore Ts'o
2019-01-02 14:27 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).