From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACECDC2F3A0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4B020861 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548079731; bh=l8fnXtEYXez60iOfa/EYcN0Hhpgl4hB77+xHHkD8qfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=1x+jSfcWtZjWqrgYs4hz3BTCrs5n9ByOc/hSZUxAFLKUg1cEKAVePP6akZyNOMabV pLput9kfA3B12Hh3GuaoAraqm5BEB9ghvTVDjkCr/SMUs+3uJmjz2HG9XLEtzm8fYq KhFyGAGr6op7sQgrR2wFiKi6WhZ2fcnuMV8pqHDM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731896AbfAUN63 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:58:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43955 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731842AbfAUN62 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:58:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B762084C; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:58:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548079107; bh=l8fnXtEYXez60iOfa/EYcN0Hhpgl4hB77+xHHkD8qfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RWuehetkiXsgze+FpSQ33yYHMnkaMYptJpshKUHuWOUVu4rz+Jg/Qj+l0pa26mPpB rr+zE/p64wgjuG1c4OfJXDAPQQ3HALZk4W7OjVkW3c7ac+YimyVJdl6omNUeN9UYbP mN1JjaAZIXM2I4fcLLvzltw389+G2Ver+aezbBSg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Bohrer , Florian Westphal , Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: [PATCH 4.19 11/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: move all list iterations under spinlock Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:48:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20190121134914.352297721@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190121134913.924726465@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190121134913.924726465@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Pablo Neira Ayuso commit 2f971a8f425545da52ca0e6bee81f5b1ea0ccc5f upstream. Two CPUs may race to remove a connection from the list, the existing conn->dead will result in a use-after-free. Use the per-list spinlock to protect list iterations. As all accesses to the list now happen while holding the per-list lock, we no longer need to delay free operations with rcu. Joint work with Florian. Fixes: 5c789e131cbb9 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search") Reviewed-by: Shawn Bohrer Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ struct nf_conncount_tuple { struct nf_conntrack_zone zone; int cpu; u32 jiffies32; - bool dead; - struct rcu_head rcu_head; }; struct nf_conncount_rb { @@ -83,36 +81,21 @@ static int key_diff(const u32 *a, const return memcmp(a, b, klen * sizeof(u32)); } -static void __conn_free(struct rcu_head *h) -{ - struct nf_conncount_tuple *conn; - - conn = container_of(h, struct nf_conncount_tuple, rcu_head); - kmem_cache_free(conncount_conn_cachep, conn); -} - static bool conn_free(struct nf_conncount_list *list, struct nf_conncount_tuple *conn) { bool free_entry = false; - spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock); - - if (conn->dead) { - spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock); - return free_entry; - } + lockdep_assert_held(&list->list_lock); list->count--; - conn->dead = true; - list_del_rcu(&conn->node); + list_del(&conn->node); if (list->count == 0) { list->dead = true; free_entry = true; } - spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock); - call_rcu(&conn->rcu_head, __conn_free); + kmem_cache_free(conncount_conn_cachep, conn); return free_entry; } @@ -242,7 +225,7 @@ void nf_conncount_list_init(struct nf_co } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conncount_list_init); -/* Return true if the list is empty */ +/* Return true if the list is empty. Must be called with BH disabled. */ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *net, struct nf_conncount_list *list) { @@ -253,12 +236,18 @@ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *ne bool free_entry = false; bool ret = false; + /* don't bother if other cpu is already doing GC */ + if (!spin_trylock(&list->list_lock)) + return false; + list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, conn_n, &list->head, node) { found = find_or_evict(net, list, conn, &free_entry); if (IS_ERR(found)) { if (PTR_ERR(found) == -ENOENT) { - if (free_entry) + if (free_entry) { + spin_unlock(&list->list_lock); return true; + } collected++; } continue; @@ -271,23 +260,24 @@ bool nf_conncount_gc_list(struct net *ne * closed already -> ditch it */ nf_ct_put(found_ct); - if (conn_free(list, conn)) + if (conn_free(list, conn)) { + spin_unlock(&list->list_lock); return true; + } collected++; continue; } nf_ct_put(found_ct); if (collected > CONNCOUNT_GC_MAX_NODES) - return false; + break; } - spin_lock_bh(&list->list_lock); if (!list->count) { list->dead = true; ret = true; } - spin_unlock_bh(&list->list_lock); + spin_unlock(&list->list_lock); return ret; } @@ -478,6 +468,7 @@ static void tree_gc_worker(struct work_s tree = data->gc_tree % CONNCOUNT_SLOTS; root = &data->root[tree]; + local_bh_disable(); rcu_read_lock(); for (node = rb_first(root); node != NULL; node = rb_next(node)) { rbconn = rb_entry(node, struct nf_conncount_rb, node); @@ -485,6 +476,9 @@ static void tree_gc_worker(struct work_s gc_count++; } rcu_read_unlock(); + local_bh_enable(); + + cond_resched(); spin_lock_bh(&nf_conncount_locks[tree]); if (gc_count < ARRAY_SIZE(gc_nodes))