From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC1BC282C3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96504217D7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:45:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548359144; bh=FCfmeWfhaef0x9zhqbT72OKy0Vdoou6+m/96PsFY6EU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=m/wofiS8mNYgv7kWEiyGoK3ISM938wREi4Dp9DHFFFNejxD99asjVrvVFG98hkc45 /OhE4EwhN28JAN4HCR6cuelkBPlr5f8gUSR5CpfL5GH+NYKD/fQPejPOrAtcNGZ7Y8 RJ9hQbKSmOxRAXlcrtTcDwOj2iPGtcVIlm6DtJm8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387739AbfAXToh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:44:37 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45402 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733296AbfAXToe (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:44:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60414218D4; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:44:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548359073; bh=FCfmeWfhaef0x9zhqbT72OKy0Vdoou6+m/96PsFY6EU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=De7qaSlewy8dXuYKFTMDZL453Fkc1ND6C5Ygf22WDiGSdrnOJnx9F81v5QccAvrT+ gOPvPH4L4yRLMThzXnnOq+TKNXcOT7+okbjZgQcDJstPpKdbsGbb1XJMFp4Scb+uCt zr6lV2gYFk9teOD7NCq+I6XnTwbriEsKGVmbo2tA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Corey Minyard Subject: [PATCH 4.20 127/127] ipmi:ssif: Fix handling of multi-part return messages Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:21:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20190124190217.316773561@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190124190211.984305387@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190124190211.984305387@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Corey Minyard commit 7d6380cd40f7993f75c4bde5b36f6019237e8719 upstream. The block number was not being compared right, it was off by one when checking the response. Some statistics wouldn't be incremented properly in some cases. Check to see if that middle-part messages always have 31 bytes of data. Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c @@ -632,8 +632,9 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif /* Remove the multi-part read marker. */ len -= 2; + data += 2; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) - ssif_info->data[i] = data[i+2]; + ssif_info->data[i] = data[i]; ssif_info->multi_len = len; ssif_info->multi_pos = 1; @@ -661,8 +662,19 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif } blocknum = data[0]; + len--; + data++; + + if (blocknum != 0xff && len != 31) { + /* All blocks but the last must have 31 data bytes. */ + result = -EIO; + if (ssif_info->ssif_debug & SSIF_DEBUG_MSG) + pr_info("Received middle message <31\n"); - if (ssif_info->multi_len + len - 1 > IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH) { + goto continue_op; + } + + if (ssif_info->multi_len + len > IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH) { /* Received message too big, abort the operation. */ result = -E2BIG; if (ssif_info->ssif_debug & SSIF_DEBUG_MSG) @@ -671,16 +683,14 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif goto continue_op; } - /* Remove the blocknum from the data. */ - len--; for (i = 0; i < len; i++) - ssif_info->data[i + ssif_info->multi_len] = data[i + 1]; + ssif_info->data[i + ssif_info->multi_len] = data[i]; ssif_info->multi_len += len; if (blocknum == 0xff) { /* End of read */ len = ssif_info->multi_len; data = ssif_info->data; - } else if (blocknum + 1 != ssif_info->multi_pos) { + } else if (blocknum != ssif_info->multi_pos) { /* * Out of sequence block, just abort. Block * numbers start at zero for the second block, @@ -707,6 +717,7 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif } } + continue_op: if (result < 0) { ssif_inc_stat(ssif_info, receive_errors); } else { @@ -714,8 +725,6 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif ssif_inc_stat(ssif_info, received_message_parts); } - - continue_op: if (ssif_info->ssif_debug & SSIF_DEBUG_STATE) pr_info("DONE 1: state = %d, result=%d\n", ssif_info->ssif_state, result);