stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Cc: Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Handle the case where PROGRAM LOAD does not reset the cache
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:09:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190125120910.59c33a4b@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190124173357.2a4d7f13@bbrezillon>

Hello,

Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> wrote on Thu, 24 Jan 2019
17:33:57 +0100:

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:16:37 +0100
> Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Den tors 24 jan. 2019 kl 16:28 skrev Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>:  
> > >
> > > On 24.01.19 15:20, Boris Brezillon wrote:    
> > > > Looks like PROGRAM LOAD (AKA write cache) does not necessarily reset
> > > > the cache content to 0xFF (depends on vendor implementation), so we
> > > > must fill the page cache entirely even if we only want to program the
> > > > data portion of the page, otherwise we might corrupt the BBM or user
> > > > data previously programmed in OOB area.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 7529df465248 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI NANDs")
> > > > Reported-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>    
> > >
> > > Works fine (limited testing only yet), so:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stefan
> > >    
> > 
> > Can this quirk be made vendor specific?  
> 
> We can make it vendor specific, as long as it's an opt-in thing. This
> way, the default behavior is the safest one, and only when we know a
> chip does reset the cache content on a PROGRAM LOAD time can we add this
> flag.

I am fine with this approach.


Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-25 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-24 14:20 [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Handle the case where PROGRAM LOAD does not reset the cache Boris Brezillon
2019-01-24 15:25 ` Stefan Roese
2019-01-24 16:16   ` Emil Lenngren
2019-01-24 16:33     ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-25 11:09       ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-01-25 16:08         ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-28  9:55           ` Miquel Raynal
2019-01-31 11:32 ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190125120910.59c33a4b@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=emil.lenngren@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).