From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, qiaonuohan@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v2] ipmi_si: fix use-after-free of resource->name
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:36:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128023623.GA4979@minyard.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C4E609A.7050609@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:53:30AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/1/26 23:08, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 05:14:54PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > When we excute the following commands, we got oops
> > > rmmod ipmi_si
> > > cat /proc/ioports
> > >
> > snip..
> >
> > > If io_setup is called successful in try_smi_init() but try_smi_init()
> > > goes out_err before calling ipmi_register_smi(), so ipmi_unregister_smi()
> > > will not be called while removing module. It leads to the resource that
> > > allocated in io_setup() can not be freed, but the name(DEVICE_NAME) of
> > > resource is freed while removing the module. It causes use-after-free
> > > when cat /proc/ioports.
> > >
> > > Fix this by calling io_cleanup() while try_smi_init() goes to out_err
> > > and don't call release_region() if request_region() is not called to
> > > avoid error prints.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 93c303d2045b ("ipmi_si: Clean up shutdown a bit")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Reported-by: NuoHan Qiao <qiaonuohan@huawei.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 5 +++++
> > > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c | 3 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > index dc8603d..f1b9fda 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> > > @@ -2085,6 +2085,11 @@ static int try_smi_init(struct smi_info *new_smi)
> > > WARN_ON(new_smi->io.dev->init_name != NULL);
> > > out_err:
> > > + if (rv && new_smi->io.io_cleanup) {
> > > + new_smi->io.io_cleanup(&new_smi->io);
> > > + new_smi->io.io_cleanup = NULL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > kfree(init_name);
> > > return rv;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > index ef6dffc..0c46a3f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> > > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static void port_cleanup(struct si_sm_io *io)
> > > unsigned int addr = io->addr_data;
> > > int idx;
> > > + if (io->regsize != 1 && io->regsize != 2 && io->regsize != 4)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > Why do you need this part? I can't see the reason for it. The addr
> > part below should handle that, especially with the above change.
> >
> > -corey
> If ipmi_si_port_setup() returns in default case, request_region() won't be
> called,
> so we don't need to call release_region() or it will prints some warning
> messages like
> this "Trying to free nonexistent resource...".
>
> We don't need call io_cleanup() until the io_setup() returns successful.
> How about change this part like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> index ef6dffc..03924c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_port_io.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,6 @@ int ipmi_si_port_setup(struct si_sm_io *io)
> if (!addr)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - io->io_cleanup = port_cleanup;
> -
> /*
> * Figure out the actual inb/inw/inl/etc routine to use based
> * upon the register size.
> @@ -109,5 +107,8 @@ int ipmi_si_port_setup(struct si_sm_io *io)
> return -EIO;
> }
> }
> +
> + io->io_cleanup = port_cleanup;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
That, I believe, is the right fix. Same thing for memory I/O, too.
Thanks,
-corey
> >
> > > if (addr) {
> > > for (idx = 0; idx < io->io_size; idx++)
> > > release_region(addr + idx * io->regspacing,
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openipmi-developer mailing list
> > > Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
> > .
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-26 9:14 [PATCH v2] ipmi_si: fix use-after-free of resource->name Yang Yingliang
2019-01-26 15:08 ` [Openipmi-developer] " Corey Minyard
2019-01-28 1:53 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-01-28 2:36 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128023623.GA4979@minyard.net \
--to=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=qiaonuohan@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).