* [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour [not found] <20190208140600.24996-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-02-08 14:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-02-08 14:42 ` Stefan Berger 2019-02-08 14:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel: Return -E2BIG when the transfer is incomplete Jarkko Sakkinen 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-integrity Cc: linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, Jarkko Sakkinen, stable The send() callback should never return length as it does not in every driver except tpm_crb in the success case. The reason is that the main transmit functionality only cares about whether the transmit was successful or not and ignores the count completely. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c | 6 +++++- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c | 3 +-- drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 2 +- 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c index 64dc560859f2..13dc614b7ebc 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static int st33zp24_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, unsigned char *buf, goto out_err; } - return len; + return 0; out_err: st33zp24_cancel(chip); release_locality(chip); diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c index 66a14526aaf4..a290b30a0c35 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int tpm_atml_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) iowrite8(buf[i], priv->iobase); } - return count; + return 0; } static void tpm_atml_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c index 4720b2442ffe..aa11c8a1df5e 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c @@ -65,7 +65,11 @@ static int i2c_atmel_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) dev_dbg(&chip->dev, "%s(buf=%*ph len=%0zx) -> sts=%d\n", __func__, (int)min_t(size_t, 64, len), buf, len, status); - return status; + + if (status < 0) + return status; + + return 0; } static int i2c_atmel_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c index 3b490d9d90e7..3b4e9672ff6c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_i2c_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) /* go and do it */ iic_tpm_write(TPM_STS(tpm_dev.locality), &sts, 1); - return len; + return 0; out_err: tpm_tis_i2c_ready(chip); /* The TPM needs some time to clean up here, diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c index 5700cc2ddee1..315a3b4548f7 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) } dev_dbg(dev, "%s() -> %zd\n", __func__, len); - return len; + return 0; } static bool i2c_nuvoton_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c index 07b5a487d0c8..aeae3222723c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) rc = 0; ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = false; } else - rc = count; + rc = 0; spin_unlock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock); return rc; diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c index 26a2be555288..d74f3de74ae6 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c @@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ static int vtpm_proxy_is_driver_command(struct tpm_chip *chip, static int vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) { struct proxy_dev *proxy_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); - int rc = 0; if (count > sizeof(proxy_dev->buffer)) { dev_err(&chip->dev, @@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ static int vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) wake_up_interruptible(&proxy_dev->wq); - return rc; + return 0; } static void vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c index 1259e935fd58..4e2d00cb0d81 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int vtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) return -ETIME; } - return count; + return 0; } static int vtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) -- 2.19.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 14:42 ` Stefan Berger 2019-02-08 15:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen, linux-integrity Cc: linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > The send() callback should never return length as it does not in every > driver except tpm_crb in the success case. The reason is that the main > transmit functionality only cares about whether the transmit was > successful or not and ignores the count completely. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c | 6 +++++- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 2 +- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c | 3 +-- > drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 2 +- At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... > 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c > index 64dc560859f2..13dc614b7ebc 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/st33zp24/st33zp24.c > @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ static int st33zp24_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, unsigned char *buf, > goto out_err; > } > > - return len; > + return 0; > out_err: > st33zp24_cancel(chip); > release_locality(chip); > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c > index 66a14526aaf4..a290b30a0c35 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int tpm_atml_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > iowrite8(buf[i], priv->iobase); > } > > - return count; > + return 0; > } > > static void tpm_atml_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip) > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c > index 4720b2442ffe..aa11c8a1df5e 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c > @@ -65,7 +65,11 @@ static int i2c_atmel_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) > dev_dbg(&chip->dev, > "%s(buf=%*ph len=%0zx) -> sts=%d\n", __func__, > (int)min_t(size_t, 64, len), buf, len, status); > - return status; > + > + if (status < 0) > + return status; > + > + return 0; > } > > static int i2c_atmel_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > index 3b490d9d90e7..3b4e9672ff6c 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_i2c_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) > /* go and do it */ > iic_tpm_write(TPM_STS(tpm_dev.locality), &sts, 1); > > - return len; > + return 0; > out_err: > tpm_tis_i2c_ready(chip); > /* The TPM needs some time to clean up here, > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c > index 5700cc2ddee1..315a3b4548f7 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c > @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) > } > > dev_dbg(dev, "%s() -> %zd\n", __func__, len); > - return len; > + return 0; > } > > static bool i2c_nuvoton_req_canceled(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 status) > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c > index 07b5a487d0c8..aeae3222723c 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > rc = 0; > ibmvtpm->tpm_processing_cmd = false; > } else > - rc = count; > + rc = 0; > > spin_unlock(&ibmvtpm->rtce_lock); > return rc; > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c > index 26a2be555288..d74f3de74ae6 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c > @@ -335,7 +335,6 @@ static int vtpm_proxy_is_driver_command(struct tpm_chip *chip, > static int vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > { > struct proxy_dev *proxy_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev); > - int rc = 0; > > if (count > sizeof(proxy_dev->buffer)) { > dev_err(&chip->dev, > @@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ static int vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > > wake_up_interruptible(&proxy_dev->wq); > > - return rc; > + return 0; > } > > static void vtpm_proxy_tpm_op_cancel(struct tpm_chip *chip) > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > index 1259e935fd58..4e2d00cb0d81 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int vtpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) > return -ETIME; > } > > - return count; > + return 0; > } > > static int vtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 14:42 ` Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 15:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-02-08 15:45 ` Stefan Berger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also > returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier > that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter back as a return value). /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 15:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 15:45 ` Stefan Berger 2019-02-08 16:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also >> returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier >> that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... > That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. > callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter > back as a return value). Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... > > /Jarkko > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 15:45 ` Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 16:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-02-08 16:19 ` Stefan Berger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also > > > returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier > > > that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... > > That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. > > callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter > > back as a return value). > > Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... That's still a better option. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 16:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 16:19 ` Stefan Berger 2019-02-08 16:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On 2/8/19 11:07 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: >> On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>>> At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also >>>> returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier >>>> that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... >>> That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. >>> callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter >>> back as a return value). >> Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... > That's still a better option. tpm_tis_core.c's tpm_tis_send_main() also needs fixing... > > /Jarkko > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 16:19 ` Stefan Berger @ 2019-02-08 16:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2019-02-08 16:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 11:07 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also > > > > > returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier > > > > > that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... > > > > That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. > > > > callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter > > > > back as a return value). > > > Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... > > That's still a better option. > > tpm_tis_core.c's tpm_tis_send_main() also needs fixing... Weird I had that fixed in my working area. Probably somehow managed not to stage that change. It was like the very first things that I fixed. Updating.. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour 2019-02-08 16:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 16:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity, linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, stable On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:26:15PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > On 2/8/19 11:07 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) are also > > > > > > returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the outlier > > > > > > that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't need it... > > > > > That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. > > > > > callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length parameter > > > > > back as a return value). > > > > Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... > > > That's still a better option. > > > > tpm_tis_core.c's tpm_tis_send_main() also needs fixing... > > Weird I had that fixed in my working area. Probably somehow managed > not to stage that change. It was like the very first things that > I fixed. Updating.. tpm_tis_send() would be the right function. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel: Return -E2BIG when the transfer is incomplete [not found] <20190208140600.24996-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> 2019-02-08 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 14:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2019-02-08 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-integrity Cc: linux-kernel, linux-security-module, Peter Huewe, Jason Gunthorpe, Stefan Berger, Nayna Jain, Jarkko Sakkinen, stable Return -E2BIG when the transfer is incomplete. The upper layer does not retry, so not doing that is incorrect behaviour. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: a2871c62e186 ("tpm: Add support for Atmel I2C TPMs") Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c index aa11c8a1df5e..8a7e80923091 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel.c @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static int i2c_atmel_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len) if (status < 0) return status; + /* The upper layer does not support incomplete sends. */ + if (status != len) + return -E2BIG; + return 0; } -- 2.19.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-08 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190208140600.24996-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2019-02-08 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 14:42 ` Stefan Berger
2019-02-08 15:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 15:45 ` Stefan Berger
2019-02-08 16:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 16:19 ` Stefan Berger
2019-02-08 16:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 16:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-02-08 14:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm/tpm_i2c_atmel: Return -E2BIG when the transfer is incomplete Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).