From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E921C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255B720663 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551105917; bh=RSSPIGGr+Vs8r5rLMNtRLQy0tjQ/iqhoAvECGlz4heU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=uH87H8akI/X+DO7SZECahP038aPdI58ErXjd5c8s24p28L2MnEC3TDQarzxFDPiWA ppR8r8WMHcE8Vkoqc1/Z1xLMSwEO2fwvU6x2ZVjTs+qrjWA+O+u3SLK6GPfoNlOcFx fdPzlm697ygt/j5wRXE4S+w125InAeCMdwd9mz+g= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727421AbfBYOpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:45:16 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38528 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726313AbfBYOpQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:45:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6715720643; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551105915; bh=RSSPIGGr+Vs8r5rLMNtRLQy0tjQ/iqhoAvECGlz4heU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k+BY0ksUpdGnfcZI4cPlVaaIW8rvL1VORzDTkKwE/An9g79b/CoqxE3ZZAoJ/5vye HVLhMBwQwVa9X7c7z/aUqZvMYxvmGX9W9WT3DpGvlY+f4u59WmfGfIgi/jz+Kc4fCT JnReJYdzjkMjyTuvxbIcSaiCfTqsei7JiEHe+EOA= Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:45:13 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: Clang patches for 4.9 Message-ID: <20190225144513.GA14055@kroah.com> References: <20190225061301.GA23411@archlinux-ryzen> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190225061301.GA23411@archlinux-ryzen> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:13:01PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Hi Greg and Sasha, > > Attached are three mbox files containing patches that bring the Clang > backports that Nick did in 4.9.139 up to date with what is currently in > 4.14 and mainline, as well as fix warnings that are present in the arm64 > and x86_64 defconfigs here and in AOSP (cuttlefish_defconfig). All of > these warnings are fixed in 4.14 so there will be no regressions from > upgrading. Really? I see a number of these only showing up in much newer kernels. Specifically these patches: 1f60652dd586 ("pinctrl: max77620: Use define directive for max77620_pinconf_param values") a0dd6773038f ("phy: tegra: remove redundant self assignment of 'map'") a9903f04e0a4 ("sched/sysctl: Fix attributes of some extern declarations") from the "arm" mbox you provided. Why shouldn't the above patches go into 4.14.y and in some cases, also 4.19.y and 4.20.y? thanks, greg k-h