From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322A0C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAF920663 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:47:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551106044; bh=bbI21qzMq9+BmFRVS2XOjkfRmIjb1UsE0IGeAoPXTWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wFv0eYtKbiYJQfSLlXF4MqLE3dOlQa6VPLp4Huk2EHRVEN7ATaHpUTsv57iucxFUv McXgh2ipgRwbxkxWtLxVDilWk/9EAj29xI7qBsiFEJTHw272t98c9XUE0f5qD7H0P8 v/P0AGNFZiyYPTzU4/2KXuMa5IptaoqFsm0TcWbw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727538AbfBYOrX (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38804 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727443AbfBYOrX (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F09220643; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:47:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551106042; bh=bbI21qzMq9+BmFRVS2XOjkfRmIjb1UsE0IGeAoPXTWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jtMOx4bmIecFQtM8B2mTZfKYEdmE8fXumqLT+HhRGkA4eScR67IUIbrYFdBUB+vpa Mc8ZRwaKFj73Dq091qpfJTitVt0qts0VZ5IIbCI1RXZhYqH+gIqevK6s2cS9SqlxlO 72bYmtrw50xv0amoUWh4Qp7D5NdyscoFGttsMrc8= Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 15:47:19 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: Clang patches for 4.9 Message-ID: <20190225144719.GA14597@kroah.com> References: <20190225061301.GA23411@archlinux-ryzen> <20190225144513.GA14055@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190225144513.GA14055@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:45:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:13:01PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > Hi Greg and Sasha, > > > > Attached are three mbox files containing patches that bring the Clang > > backports that Nick did in 4.9.139 up to date with what is currently in > > 4.14 and mainline, as well as fix warnings that are present in the arm64 > > and x86_64 defconfigs here and in AOSP (cuttlefish_defconfig). All of > > these warnings are fixed in 4.14 so there will be no regressions from > > upgrading. > > Really? I see a number of these only showing up in much newer kernels. > Specifically these patches: > 1f60652dd586 ("pinctrl: max77620: Use define directive for max77620_pinconf_param values") > a0dd6773038f ("phy: tegra: remove redundant self assignment of 'map'") > a9903f04e0a4 ("sched/sysctl: Fix attributes of some extern declarations") > > from the "arm" mbox you provided. Why shouldn't the above patches go > into 4.14.y and in some cases, also 4.19.y and 4.20.y? Also, why are you wanting 238bcbc4e07f ("kbuild: consolidate Clang compiler flags") to be in 4.9? You put it as the last patch in the series, nothing depends on it, which seems odd... greg k-h