From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFA4C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A4621773 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:33:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552901613; bh=ZkRoEbiIfoSLMBSrV1azayQTSDttdxfrMoVh634XwqI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=XOlM5xYB6JgXGYWMuap2hBUODVdjCdnTLBeqzX8+oXUDxklar0630747U6Efjl/fW PmwIYfcnZaKfUcHGmExD2bmSJi8yPANz1z1huZvbLWrwyfUG7QwxUnfNA+sDKJBlgk 3PKshDacZu1VSAni4e78oQ2h5fYZ9dOZxxWK6bT8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728336AbfCRJdc (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:33:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41830 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727964AbfCRJdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:33:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6C7C21741; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:33:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552901611; bh=ZkRoEbiIfoSLMBSrV1azayQTSDttdxfrMoVh634XwqI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=j2qMCqbbzNUQb9OSkPGBcqcYPMnhcVHCyid2xahBnfDel6q5t8JMWFUGm/BXXE3Mn c+99+OPks/QlcvjsJYDH2LPMpaIqs9JpJ7j8o77sinHjWQe5Lry7/2e7pifERE2N1v D6iYKFUIb2NKdY6JVhSLQgNv7CgWxV3KcCKw0kyU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Ni , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH 4.19 48/52] Its wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:25:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20190318084019.197495498@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190318084013.532280682@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190318084013.532280682@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xiao Ni commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream. In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data corruption. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+ Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -4630,7 +4630,6 @@ read_more: atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining); read_bio->bi_next = NULL; generic_make_request(read_bio); - sector_nr += nr_sectors; sectors_done += nr_sectors; if (sector_nr <= last) goto read_more;