stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Revert commit 310ca162d77
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:12:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320151231.GA31247@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320125806.GD9485@quack2.suse.cz>

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> commit 310ca162d77 "block/loop: Use global lock for ioctl() operation." has
> been pushed to multiple stable trees. This patch is a part of larger series
> that overhauls the locking inside loopback device upstream and for 4.4,
> 4.9, and 4.14 stable trees only this patch from the series is applied. Our
> testing now has shown [1] that the patch alone makes present deadlocks
> inside loopback driver more likely (the openqa test in our infrastructure
> didn't hit the deadlock before whereas with the new kernel it hits it
> reliably every time). So I would suggest we revert 310ca162d77 from 4.4,
> 4.9, and 4.14 kernels.

Ugh, ok.

> Another option would be to backport other locking fixes for the loop
> device but honestly I don't think that's a stable material - never heard
> of real users hitting problems, only syzkaller could, and we are still
> fixing up some small glitches resulting from that rework...

I tried to backport a number of the loop fixes, and odds are I am the
one that grabbed this.  There are other loop locking fixes in the stable
releases, I don't know if I can just revert this one, let me check...

And yes, I did get some loop bugreports from the Android kernel team as
they are using loop devices in large numbers on the new Android release
for something.  So I think they have already backported a number of
these fixes to their trees, which made me want to push these out to more
people.

Also, given that syzbot has a reproducer for 310ca162d77, are we worst
off if we revert it?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-20 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-20 12:58 Revert commit 310ca162d77 Jan Kara
2019-03-20 15:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-03-20 15:16   ` Greg KH
2019-03-21 10:41     ` Jan Kara
2019-03-20 15:16 ` Greg KH
2019-03-21 10:26   ` Jan Kara
2019-04-29 12:05 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2019-04-29 14:04   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190320151231.GA31247@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).