From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5946C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C102218E2 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:09:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553260186; bh=gJ7W2T8ZuWW+MM+4MTgiGpHBqRTW6UkN4YqAM1H3FRU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=qUuwGsL0WOAplsBRyzgr/XX9uAgn7fRv3TCuhPKIpz+qIsTJwSxCX/6f1kSMGRWb7 qC04gPRkK0ccAY5uL0jZMPxIAAVBbwplTDyIiAF8j45UGmEsJf8BaLM93UFCQlv7rD iNIt59sk73kTMoHDjdW0yK6h7IbNnZuwmuhi1Poo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730037AbfCVLei (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:34:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35330 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730447AbfCVLei (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:34:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18A2421929; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:34:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553254477; bh=gJ7W2T8ZuWW+MM+4MTgiGpHBqRTW6UkN4YqAM1H3FRU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hH2Ujph3VjUKoc+vxfcGa2x6cJTewrKkuBynLLPciFczjypvRVu2zwT0lZB2JFCgL glgJBMX1kNyPnTJYn8R2dfKyxVnahzVzl6uhGT1dzE5EN/iA4L9Il+w/scueHFJcf1 sglo26KE92QmXnApJ/cgjfuXXKrNHiK7TW1aUDRk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Xiao Ni , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH 4.4 148/230] Its wrong to add len to sector_nr in raid10 reshape twice Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20190322111247.061986500@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190322111236.796964179@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190322111236.796964179@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Xiao Ni commit b761dcf1217760a42f7897c31dcb649f59b2333e upstream. In reshape_request it already adds len to sector_nr already. It's wrong to add len to sector_nr again after adding pages to bio. If there is bad block it can't copy one chunk at a time, it needs to goto read_more. Now the sector_nr is wrong. It can cause data corruption. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+ Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -4442,7 +4442,6 @@ bio_full: atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining); read_bio->bi_next = NULL; generic_make_request(read_bio); - sector_nr += nr_sectors; sectors_done += nr_sectors; if (sector_nr <= last) goto read_more;