From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8CDC43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:47:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15162070D for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:47:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553258853; bh=G+Y9YB6MEDfDmZ9WtouE9FQo99Qw6s6ACx36pRinoUw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=kI0M84LKEwvGPj+upHbhfsYXHAGfwwnF2lXrqkQTjSLU6ylIAsHk52mk1I0+i/80F bgJn/cfs06e8kVXyv+j6dIqow0Tu6IzV1OmwEviwLV6rWw7g2KJZ7nh+JfdNTQZ122 /0fc8M9YxhW5R6HOvzdfsHpe1l+VUhWdNpd6d/F8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387797AbfCVL6R (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:58:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34898 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387438AbfCVL6Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:58:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B98072192C; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:58:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553255895; bh=G+Y9YB6MEDfDmZ9WtouE9FQo99Qw6s6ACx36pRinoUw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=r9+fbCi64N157Y4iO46KGDYAC/9+Tvb2VG7vbYgzTS9fBg3GZlG0h4LaCwF7Z3Hru tBUtaIDa8PkFg66jxWFzIuekfxD3NeKStfUUQyidM06Nkqj7TtT1DPtT89azKKHwR+ FfJGYUfnMX8JIGWSq39hKPucyPrRS6bCemKOyDrM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Julien Thierry , Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 029/280] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Make vgic_dist->lpi_list_lock a raw_spinlock Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:13:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20190322111307.934423505@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190322111306.356185024@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190322111306.356185024@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit fc3bc475231e12e9c0142f60100cf84d077c79e1 ] vgic_dist->lpi_list_lock must always be taken with interrupts disabled as it is used in interrupt context. For configurations such as PREEMPT_RT_FULL, this means that it should be a raw_spinlock since RT spinlocks are interruptible. Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry Acked-by: Christoffer Dall Acked-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 2 +- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 8 ++++---- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 10 +++++----- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h index 4f31f96bbfab..90ac450745f1 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ struct vgic_dist { u64 propbaser; /* Protects the lpi_list and the count value below. */ - spinlock_t lpi_list_lock; + raw_spinlock_t lpi_list_lock; struct list_head lpi_list_head; int lpi_list_count; diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c index c0c0b88af1d5..33e7ee814f7b 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm) struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dist->lpi_list_head); - spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock); } /* CREATION */ diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 12502251727e..f376c82afb61 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, irq->target_vcpu = vcpu; irq->group = 1; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); /* * There could be a race with another vgic_add_lpi(), so we need to @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, dist->lpi_list_count++; out_unlock: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); /* * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's. @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr) if (!intids) return -ENOMEM; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) { if (i == irq_count) break; @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ int vgic_copy_lpi_list(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 **intid_ptr) continue; intids[i++] = irq->intid; } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); *intid_ptr = intids; return i; diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c index f884a54b2601..c5165e3b80cb 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid) struct vgic_irq *irq = NULL; unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(irq, &dist->lpi_list_head, lpi_list) { if (irq->intid != intid) @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid) irq = NULL; out_unlock: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); return irq; } @@ -138,15 +138,15 @@ void vgic_put_irq(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq) if (irq->intid < VGIC_MIN_LPI) return; - spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); if (!kref_put(&irq->refcount, vgic_irq_release)) { - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); return; }; list_del(&irq->lpi_list); dist->lpi_list_count--; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); kfree(irq); } -- 2.19.1