From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F41C43381 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:23:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F384F218D8 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:23:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553977410; bh=y2EJ0ugfgOJ6LxIQuvtWIy4BDAoO8hHT4WPtiExCTvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=r1VkHG37UMdWvMSsRnMjh+NBj4esvx7nHBeHoclYvjpipXshzezGEmINuIiXYVdfc OphakTfO2Lp27HaLY9pWm/BNOSMpBd57uXojwgc+CxJjvNbyVFXIilRqJhN7684yfN i1/330WPj4R2CeLylGIv1UhTt+Tl1LBnkbc0Je7c= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730768AbfC3UX3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:23:29 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48634 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730761AbfC3UX3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:23:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F19B218D0; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553977408; bh=y2EJ0ugfgOJ6LxIQuvtWIy4BDAoO8hHT4WPtiExCTvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=v64HZCOamlvVogJc4SWRyg1Jz5qZFlasO6IKvnXoGJUoy9CrdZ5vZAP3nsz5FLPlX m1nOoQSUJouXzlTiDafuIKUZ1szq+8gfi1WysZ8j2xUzgmvegwuyjqedybALYryH8/ 8XF+tiM1Yqb9DHAjtQv/ni+dY2LUdfFkMrCyRyOY= Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:23:27 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: James Bottomley Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rgerganov@vmware.com, felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] USB: gadget: f_hid: fix deadlock in f_hidg_write()" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree Message-ID: <20190330202327.GQ25262@sasha-vm> References: <1553975841150122@kroah.com> <1553976383.2893.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1553976383.2893.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 01:06:23PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 20:57 +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >> The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. >> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm >> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git >> commit id to . > >[...] > >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.11+ >> Fixes: 749494b6bdbb ("usb: gadget: f_hid: fix: Move IN request >> allocation to set_alt()") > >The cc: stable specifies 4.11+ because the commit it fixes went in in >the 4.11 merge window. Is there something incorrect with the tagging >that makes you think it should apply to 4.9? The commit it fixes was tagged for stable and backported to kernels such as 4.9. -- Thanks, Sasha