[RFC/RFT PATCH 06/18] crypto: chacha20poly1305 - set cra_name correctly

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations,
e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than
"rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up
included in the instance's cra_name.  This is incorrect because it then
prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the
highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected.
Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way.

Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying
algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names.
This matches what other templates do.

Fixes: 71ebc4d1b27d ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2+
Cc: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
 crypto/chacha20poly1305.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c b/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c
index ed2e12e26dd80..279d816ab51dd 100644
--- a/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c
+++ b/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c
@@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb,
 
 	err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
 	if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
-		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha_name,
-		     poly_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
+		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_name,
+		     poly->cra_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
 		goto out_drop_chacha;
 	if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
 		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_driver_name,
-- 
2.21.0