stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix blk_mq_try_issue_directly()
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:08:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404070849.GD5004@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403201126.22819-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:11:26PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If blk_mq_try_issue_directly() returns BLK_STS*_RESOURCE that means that
> the request has not been queued and that the caller should retry to submit
> the request. Both blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() and
> blk_mq_sched_insert_request() guarantee that a request will be processed.
> Hence return BLK_STS_OK if one of these functions is called. This patch
> avoids that blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list() crashes when using dm-mpath.
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> Fixes: 7f556a44e61d ("blk-mq: refactor the code of issue request directly") # v5.0.
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 652d0c6d5945..b2c20dce8a30 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1859,16 +1859,11 @@ blk_status_t blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  	case BLK_STS_RESOURCE:
>  		if (force) {
>  			blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(rq, run_queue);
> -			/*
> -			 * We have to return BLK_STS_OK for the DM
> -			 * to avoid livelock. Otherwise, we return
> -			 * the real result to indicate whether the
> -			 * request is direct-issued successfully.
> -			 */
> -			ret = bypass ? BLK_STS_OK : ret;
> +			ret = BLK_STS_OK;
>  		} else if (!bypass) {
>  			blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false,
>  						    run_queue, false);
> +			ret = BLK_STS_OK;
>  		}

This change itself is correct.

However, there is other issue introduced by 7f556a44e61d.

We need blk_insert_cloned_request() to pass back BLK_STS_RESOURCE/BLK_STS_RESOURCE
to caller, so that dm-rq driver may see the underlying queue is busy, then tell
blk-mq to deal with the busy condition from dm-rq queue, so that IO
merge can get improved.

That is exactly what 396eaf21ee17c476e8f6 ("blk-mq: improve DM's blk-mq IO merging
via blk_insert_cloned_request feedback") did.

There must be performance regression with 7f556a44e61d by cut the feedback.

So could you fix them all in one patch?


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03 20:11 [PATCH] block: Fix blk_mq_try_issue_directly() Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04  7:08 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-04 14:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 15:09     ` Laurence Oberman
2019-04-04 15:28       ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 15:33         ` Laurence Oberman
2019-04-04 16:47         ` Laurence Oberman
2019-04-04 17:09           ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-08  2:07 ` jianchao.wang
2019-04-08  2:36   ` jianchao.wang
2019-04-09  1:31     ` jianchao.wang
2019-04-09 12:28       ` Laurence Oberman
2019-04-10  0:51         ` jianchao.wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190404070849.GD5004@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).