From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FDFC4360F for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46AF21872 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:20:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1554466848; bh=eUlkbavJItyipRm10mynmKDeJc0Y4Hjw4TTlthUq7aE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Zd7YYScrCWbNHFHUVAVUKdGstd8aSfsJa/d6WDe9zlZee76xa4CfM2TrdaOADDhYL D/+dMeCOMXVBCaptTFCpYjIflJllLVaUY9//0Xi9XnLCgJzJep+BrF/QR1rNtxrWGn AwaEwtGw7BMxrpUwtIfYbPVbtkI/vKRDKGcq40zg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727608AbfDEMUs (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:20:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42004 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726513AbfDEMUs (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:20:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A93C21872; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:20:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1554466847; bh=eUlkbavJItyipRm10mynmKDeJc0Y4Hjw4TTlthUq7aE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yOfrX7rar3RX91fUEUKAfPycir/polv0MXUAceOE1Hd4IPj1ildNjHqXxkYYhzFmw UvSJCuiZ5DDuYMj9SROqBPLiRt/NRTvJgSRiX0RQBMxpuDgLkxrzrLLgzqyeKA9L0M n6EEZlFOssyFzIYe+oF0OWNimbB6Emmmy/4TOtPM= Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:20:44 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Toke =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= Cc: David Miller , stable@vger.kernel.org, cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.19 0/3] Backport of series: 'sched: A few small fixes for sch_cake' from 5.1 Message-ID: <20190405122044.GB2299@kroah.com> References: <155446010188.1460.16734711102827171744.stgit@alrua-x1> <20190405113429.GB28420@kroah.com> <87k1g81wgx.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87k1g81wgx.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 02:13:18PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> Hi Greg > >> > >> This series contains backports for a couple of fixes to sch_cake that was just > >> merged for 5.1. This series backports an earlier refactoring commit, which makes > >> the fixes themselves apply cleanly from upstream. > > > > You have read: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > > for how to submit networking patches to the stable trees, right? > > > > I suggest trying it that way first... > > Yeah, Dave already queued the original fixes up for stable, but they are > not going to apply cleanly on 4.19; hence the first patch in this > series. > > I thought it was better to just include the full series with that, for > context, but maybe that was wrong? Should I just have sent the first > one? If so, feel free to just take the first patch in this series and > let the others go through the usual stable submission process... Dave queues up and sends me the stable backports for networking code, as the document states. If there is a special series needed for 4.19, I'm sure he would be glad to take them. Or, I can take them directly, after I have the 5.0 series queued up, if I get an ack from him. But to seemingly circumvent the normal process, isn't ok, I need to know that at least you tried :) thanks, greg k-h