stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: revert back to max link rate and lane count on eDP
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:00:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410180035.GA31158@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ec2hvgg.fsf@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:54:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2019, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 10:52:20AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Commit 7769db588384 ("drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast
> >> and narrow") started to optize the eDP 1.4+ link config, both per spec
> >> and as preparation for display stream compression support.
> >> 
> >> Sadly, we again face panels that flat out fail with parameters they
> >> claim to support. Revert, and go back to the drawing board.
> >> 
> >> v2: Actually revert to max params instead of just wide-and-slow.
> >> 
> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109959
> >> Fixes: 7769db588384 ("drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow")
> >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
> >> Cc: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >
> > I can hear from here your "I told you so"... Sorry!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> 
> Thanks, pushed, please cherry-pick this for drm-intel-fixes.

done. going on tomorrow's pull request...

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 69 +++++----------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> index 72c490..dfa770 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> >> @@ -1856,42 +1856,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >>  	return -EINVAL;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -/* Optimize link config in order: max bpp, min lanes, min clock */
> >> -static int
> >> -intel_dp_compute_link_config_fast(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >> -				  struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> >> -				  const struct link_config_limits *limits)
> >> -{
> >> -	struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode;
> >> -	int bpp, clock, lane_count;
> >> -	int mode_rate, link_clock, link_avail;
> >> -
> >> -	for (bpp = limits->max_bpp; bpp >= limits->min_bpp; bpp -= 2 * 3) {
> >> -		mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> >> -						   bpp);
> >> -
> >> -		for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
> >> -		     lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
> >> -		     lane_count <<= 1) {
> >> -			for (clock = limits->min_clock; clock <= limits->max_clock; clock++) {
> >> -				link_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
> >> -				link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_clock,
> >> -								    lane_count);
> >> -
> >> -				if (mode_rate <= link_avail) {
> >> -					pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
> >> -					pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> >> -					pipe_config->port_clock = link_clock;
> >> -
> >> -					return 0;
> >> -				}
> >> -			}
> >> -		}
> >> -	}
> >> -
> >> -	return -EINVAL;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 dsc_max_bpc)
> >>  {
> >>  	int i, num_bpc;
> >> @@ -2028,15 +1992,13 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >>  	limits.min_bpp = 6 * 3;
> >>  	limits.max_bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> >>  
> >> -	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] < DP_EDP_14) {
> >> +	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> >>  		/*
> >>  		 * Use the maximum clock and number of lanes the eDP panel
> >> -		 * advertizes being capable of. The eDP 1.3 and earlier panels
> >> -		 * are generally designed to support only a single clock and
> >> -		 * lane configuration, and typically these values correspond to
> >> -		 * the native resolution of the panel. With eDP 1.4 rate select
> >> -		 * and DSC, this is decreasingly the case, and we need to be
> >> -		 * able to select less than maximum link config.
> >> +		 * advertizes being capable of. The panels are generally
> >> +		 * designed to support only a single clock and lane
> >> +		 * configuration, and typically these values correspond to the
> >> +		 * native resolution of the panel.
> >>  		 */
> >>  		limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count;
> >>  		limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock;
> >> @@ -2050,22 +2012,11 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >>  		      intel_dp->common_rates[limits.max_clock],
> >>  		      limits.max_bpp, adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
> >>  
> >> -	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> >> -		/*
> >> -		 * Optimize for fast and narrow. eDP 1.3 section 3.3 and eDP 1.4
> >> -		 * section A.1: "It is recommended that the minimum number of
> >> -		 * lanes be used, using the minimum link rate allowed for that
> >> -		 * lane configuration."
> >> -		 *
> >> -		 * Note that we use the max clock and lane count for eDP 1.3 and
> >> -		 * earlier, and fast vs. wide is irrelevant.
> >> -		 */
> >> -		ret = intel_dp_compute_link_config_fast(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> >> -							&limits);
> >> -	else
> >> -		/* Optimize for slow and wide. */
> >> -		ret = intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> >> -							&limits);
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Optimize for slow and wide. This is the place to add alternative
> >> +	 * optimization policy.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	ret = intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(intel_dp, pipe_config, &limits);
> >>  
> >>  	/* enable compression if the mode doesn't fit available BW */
> >>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Force DSC en = %d\n", intel_dp->force_dsc_en);
> >> -- 
> >> 2.20.1
> >> 
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-05  7:24 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: revert back to max link rate and lane count on eDP Jani Nikula
2019-04-05  7:50 ` Jani Nikula
2019-04-05  7:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2019-04-05 17:23   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-10 12:54     ` Jani Nikula
2019-04-10 18:00       ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2019-04-05 18:18   ` Manasi Navare
2019-04-05 20:13     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-04-05 20:20       ` Manasi Navare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410180035.GA31158@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).