From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92EC04E53 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B4E2084A for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:30:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557919834; bh=kndu8SAtUtlE6O5XFX8Lvk1NrcXtcxLc7hvEAE7f7uk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=nkZRpvw9XQlK3+1ffgz6pmEKaDYxqwEkdVO75BBgvCVyOdIvlU5+KKvrfHeG3MUnm WfRnzy+HNGwOZJa6yp07zf9DVjUxkJCM9H4kfbk6q1r3gYNFz6uT6Ca/S7KX1RbsKY GpuXwWaQ8KDmQFyK1cvrlwzYYJyxjwTk+6cUoI3A= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732274AbfEOLac (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 07:30:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42042 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732730AbfEOLa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 07:30:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FCF92084A; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:30:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557919828; bh=kndu8SAtUtlE6O5XFX8Lvk1NrcXtcxLc7hvEAE7f7uk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aiUlz/Y0lVSpQts8FqofY6rb3OhjvAs18FMoDWpGhwN8nYb8CEtTovd6t5HnjbHro ccMaROoMjaI7TsSgkEmaxvS9anewdNwK0UfXF4G5x2PnwyXbKTT57GMHQwhBjB+AMn nPE6HLOAwa3xWl1ypzG43nd/U/+c4+r8FUbh2Eh4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Haller , Hangbin Liu , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.0 108/137] fib_rules: return 0 directly if an exactly same rule exists when NLM_F_EXCL not supplied Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:56:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20190515090701.414733828@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190515090651.633556783@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190515090651.633556783@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Hangbin Liu [ Upstream commit e9919a24d3022f72bcadc407e73a6ef17093a849 ] With commit 153380ec4b9 ("fib_rules: Added NLM_F_EXCL support to fib_nl_newrule") we now able to check if a rule already exists. But this only works with iproute2. For other tools like libnl, NetworkManager, it still could add duplicate rules with only NLM_F_CREATE flag, like [localhost ~ ]# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default 100000: from 192.168.7.5 lookup 5 100000: from 192.168.7.5 lookup 5 As it doesn't make sense to create two duplicate rules, let's just return 0 if the rule exists. Fixes: 153380ec4b9 ("fib_rules: Added NLM_F_EXCL support to fib_nl_newrule") Reported-by: Thomas Haller Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/core/fib_rules.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/net/core/fib_rules.c +++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c @@ -756,9 +756,9 @@ int fib_nl_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, if (err) goto errout; - if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) && - rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) { - err = -EEXIST; + if (rule_exists(ops, frh, tb, rule)) { + if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) + err = -EEXIST; goto errout_free; }