From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Zubin Mithra <zsm@chromium.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Gen Zhang <blackgod016574@gmail.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: 4e78921ba4dd ("efi/x86/Add missing error handling to old_memmap 1:1 mapping code")
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604134559.GA8083@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8a77xObE8UPhDZeqzXdm48vxHOqC4resfvRJLFPavgLQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:39:15PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 14:34, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 03:38:52PM -0700, Zubin Mithra wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > CVE-2019-12380 was fixed in the upstream linux kernel with the commit :-
> > > * 4e78921ba4dd ("efi/x86/Add missing error handling to old_memmap 1:1 mapping code")
> > >
> > > Could the patch be applied in order to v4.19.y?
> >
> > Now queued up, thanks.
> >
>
> Given the discussion leading up to this, I'm slightly surprised.
>
> As I alluded to in my questions to Zubin, I am concerned that the
> testing carried out on this patch has too little coverage, given that
> a) Chrome OS apparently does not boot in EFI mode
> b) therefore, Chrome OS there does not use efi=old_map
> c) Chrome OS hardware does not implement 5 level paging
>
> I have done all the testing I could before merging the patch, but I
> would prefer to defer from backporting it until it hits a release. I
> know some people argue that this still does not provide sufficient
> coverage, but those are usually not the same people getting emails
> when their EFI systems no longer boot without any output whatsoever
> after upgrading from one stable kernel version to the next.
Ok, I'll go drop it. Can you please email stable@vger when it is in a
release so that I know to queue it up then?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 22:38 4e78921ba4dd ("efi/x86/Add missing error handling to old_memmap 1:1 mapping code") Zubin Mithra
2019-06-04 7:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-04 7:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-04 8:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-06-04 9:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-04 9:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-04 12:34 ` Greg KH
2019-06-04 13:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-04 13:45 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-06-04 13:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-04 16:38 ` Zubin Mithra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604134559.GA8083@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=blackgod016574@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zsm@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).