From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9659BC7618B for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F71022CE5 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:54:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564149270; bh=l9OGrWheufQP0+CwPOwPLWMhUfh+EraEKkAJGpVQxCc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=PQhpLb5Xta0l2uGXosdZt+KwXe/73yGcSzqGgWKTrSsaUwqu3X61BkvgEkMjoFRk0 miRkgzYoVNmMwFzH9GO5B/mnCnN7uyTKqcwpUxipmIgYQZwtVcq2Tb5dJ8DtSqGUEZ Q37huRtIhYcJ5JPGw495NTFAkwmSatzHA0nDKt4M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388043AbfGZNms (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:42:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50144 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388039AbfGZNmr (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:42:47 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D43C022CBD; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1564148566; bh=l9OGrWheufQP0+CwPOwPLWMhUfh+EraEKkAJGpVQxCc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bb8bzPxNEz2ABi49Zk8Jmd64Nq6XfifSrTMC6fR0kY8ZQH0bEP1NyBejYCZaksQNK wYeO8/p8/j+V+xd7rDoGSR9tDIYxS4PD3vkSFurmCywqi/LUyNUJqo6CjM0AkA6XC4 t/a/W8eGppdPKeXO4hbHes3nlmQtXyMV/OoHji80= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Benjamin Block , Jens Remus , Steffen Maier , "Martin K . Petersen" , Sasha Levin , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 22/47] scsi: zfcp: fix GCC compiler warning emitted with -Wmaybe-uninitialized Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:41:45 -0400 Message-Id: <20190726134210.12156-22-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190726134210.12156-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190726134210.12156-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Benjamin Block [ Upstream commit 484647088826f2f651acbda6bcf9536b8a466703 ] GCC v9 emits this warning: CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.o drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c: In function 'zfcp_erp_action_enqueue': drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c:217:26: warning: 'erp_action' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 217 | struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action; | ^~~~~~~~~~ This is a possible false positive case, as also documented in the GCC documentations: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wmaybe-uninitialized The actual code-sequence is like this: Various callers can invoke the function below with the argument "want" being one of: ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_ADAPTER, ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT_FORCED, ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT, or ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_LUN. zfcp_erp_action_enqueue(want, ...) ... need = zfcp_erp_required_act(want, ...) need = want ... maybe: need = ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT maybe: need = ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_ADAPTER ... return need ... zfcp_erp_setup_act(need, ...) struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action; // <== line 217 ... switch(need) { case ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_LUN: ... erp_action = &zfcp_sdev->erp_action; WARN_ON_ONCE(erp_action->port != port); // <== access ... break; case ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT: case ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT_FORCED: ... erp_action = &port->erp_action; WARN_ON_ONCE(erp_action->port != port); // <== access ... break; case ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_ADAPTER: ... erp_action = &adapter->erp_action; WARN_ON_ONCE(erp_action->port != NULL); // <== access ... break; } ... WARN_ON_ONCE(erp_action->adapter != adapter); // <== access When zfcp_erp_setup_act() is called, 'need' will never be anything else than one of the 4 possible enumeration-names that are used in the switch-case, and 'erp_action' is initialized for every one of them, before it is used. Thus the warning is a false positive, as documented. We introduce the extra if{} in the beginning to create an extra code-flow, so the compiler can be convinced that the switch-case will never see any other value. BUG_ON()/BUG() is intentionally not used to not crash anything, should this ever happen anyway - right now it's impossible, as argued above; and it doesn't introduce a 'default:' switch-case to retain warnings should 'enum zfcp_erp_act_type' ever be extended and no explicit case be introduced. See also v5.0 commit 399b6c8bc9f7 ("scsi: zfcp: drop old default switch case which might paper over missing case"). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block Reviewed-by: Jens Remus Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c index ebdbc457003f..332701db7379 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_erp.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) KMSG_COMPONENT ": " fmt #include +#include #include "zfcp_ext.h" #include "zfcp_reqlist.h" @@ -238,6 +239,12 @@ static struct zfcp_erp_action *zfcp_erp_setup_act(int need, u32 act_status, struct zfcp_erp_action *erp_action; struct zfcp_scsi_dev *zfcp_sdev; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(need != ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_LUN && + need != ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT && + need != ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_PORT_FORCED && + need != ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_ADAPTER)) + return NULL; + switch (need) { case ZFCP_ERP_ACTION_REOPEN_LUN: zfcp_sdev = sdev_to_zfcp(sdev); -- 2.20.1