From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>,
Linux Stable maillist <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.2.10-rc1-61d06c6.cki (stable)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:55:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190818235546.GA15418@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38430602-3b5e-5217-aeae-13fcd82a9c1f@applied-asynchrony.com>
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>On 8/18/19 10:38 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>On 8/18/19 8:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 02:31:22PM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
>>>>
>>>> Kernel repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>>> Commit: 61d06c60569f - Linux 5.2.10-rc1
>>>>
>>>>The results of these automated tests are provided below.
>>>>
>>>> Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
>>>> Merge: OK
>>>> Compile: OK
>>>> Tests: FAILED
>>>>
>>>>All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
>>>>
>>>> https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/108998
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>One or more kernel tests failed:
>>>>
>>>> aarch64:
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>> ppc64le:
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>> x86_64:
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>> ❌ Boot test
>>>>
>>>
>>>Are these all real?
>>>
>>
>>Hi Greg,
>>
>>the current 5.2-queue also fails to boot for me when applied to 5.2.9,
>>so this is not a false positive. I had a handful of the queued patches in my
>>own tree and know which ones work in 5.2.9, but the new ones for -mm look
>>like they could cause problems. I'll try a few things..
>
>The culprit is "exit-make-setting-exit_state-consistent.patch", which was
>successfully added everywhere. This explains why KCI is consistently sad
>everywhere, too. :)
>
>Removing that patch from the queue results in a working kernel (with the
>version updated by me):
>
>$cat /proc/version
>Linux version 5.2.10 (root@ragnarok) (gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0 p1)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 18 23:50:50 CEST 2019
Are you seeing the same failure with upstream kernel?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-18 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-18 18:31 ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.2.10-rc1-61d06c6.cki (stable) CKI Project
2019-08-18 18:49 ` Greg KH
2019-08-18 20:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2019-08-18 21:57 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2019-08-18 23:55 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-08-19 4:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190818235546.GA15418@sasha-vm \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox