From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10AAC3A5A9 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA5A206BB for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:27:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567621675; bh=ykLzgQ2M+stSgkxSdBahC71YW717D4EkVNvvDv6Pqbo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=a0gBKLBGEw2ruMOuR/JgL875CcuWwuxdXG34PdgI8PoC6zT0p91GaTR3ua9aqhpqa z27nxNNOS7yHZx66Y+emZcnHGXKI8BDdLnK2S4U9p2YrQ+kg8ZzebEpzeIcz/miE5Z FsRkUbeCDSk4hgRIS8dXGjY+VZ6w0c5WLLmTK/hI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732668AbfIDRzb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:55:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60554 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732659AbfIDRza (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:55:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F387221883; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567619729; bh=ykLzgQ2M+stSgkxSdBahC71YW717D4EkVNvvDv6Pqbo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rvxB19IaPM8Wrr7PMgZpz7I8THEUwxWJPzJoo7RhZ0bpORrxnhf7ZjcpLOUE65nyX Y3qT1t4oqrAj9tQvOxiCZlnWRgW32yTDXCNap/ABwH1HIexEVqI7A5KayA+mrWBJiS hBLrVc9RsGZhPV7oSTpeQFIK+O8s90Z2pLY7Fofs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Michael Petlan , Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Satheesh Rajendran , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 13/77] perf bench numa: Fix cpu0 binding Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:53:00 +0200 Message-Id: <20190904175304.940339603@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20190904175303.317468926@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190904175303.317468926@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit 6bbfe4e602691b90ac866712bd4c43c51e546a60 ] Michael reported an issue with perf bench numa failing with binding to cpu0 with '-0' option. # perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd # Running 'numa/mem' benchmark: # Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZcm0 --thp 1 -M 1 -ddd" binding to node 0, mask: 0000000000000001 => -1 perf: bench/numa.c:356: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(ret)' failed. Aborted (core dumped) This happens when the cpu0 is not part of node0, which is the benchmark assumption and we can see that's not the case for some powerpc servers. Using correct node for cpu0 binding. Reported-by: Michael Petlan Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Satheesh Rajendran Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801142642.28004-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index df41deed0320e..3bfba81d19118 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -370,8 +370,10 @@ static u8 *alloc_data(ssize_t bytes0, int map_flags, /* Allocate and initialize all memory on CPU#0: */ if (init_cpu0) { - orig_mask = bind_to_node(0); - bind_to_memnode(0); + int node = numa_node_of_cpu(0); + + orig_mask = bind_to_node(node); + bind_to_memnode(node); } bytes = bytes0 + HPSIZE; -- 2.20.1