From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7532FC5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD8A20CC7 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RwkevxXm" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725981AbfIKOOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:14:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:33041 "EHLO mail-qk1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726766AbfIKOOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:14:38 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x134so20961890qkb.0 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:14:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7PAitQHL+9OmPJD/qYJCL+lndrVFV+sR4lmISQrAj+w=; b=RwkevxXmHWQbg/1zcSGNdh0GHAV7wXHU14a+K7AgO3k15tFyk4XbTgdIYmEQOWoeIT ZZn0LkFYyYOZoat+vM3ee0A18fZAR9eAfuCzatQG9o03EbL/aAi/2zvBSdxm4SXWNNYC vjyiF5VGgJnwGnIHW0SGSBPUz46XZMd3oxISBt7B0xNbM/2/CjIf+s+5X0VO7UQTZFy8 TQuKfVeR/jgkdkfsviuWe6cTf1DSklON+N26WZE/1KlCN4O1yEGdYsLhScL9K5Za+p+k U21O82aM2dgpm/POCdDFrQBqpxJZgK94gBtpIxmuP2WLpcPQPd4vqeai/HrbEkii/+Ph 3CcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7PAitQHL+9OmPJD/qYJCL+lndrVFV+sR4lmISQrAj+w=; b=GfQ4uQjbxiAz8pe/hlqSnMbmySB34AVeC3b+7BuzQOJR6tv72JLvc1K+BvI3IxKVes ohRjxcWjzNlAQBA2ihUJ8yx3pQKVkwkXBMcaClDNRkiHK2xon4Xi66i7DwGDchNCkEhx kIDTIsFzzO+heniaupPYRTiQdZ7mzAV8A2P0uzCMqoiS0TtQZkSGzszajtYlc9BqnUDW 9S49HqQYCKSAa99/CdHMrplVCLd+e7lG6ZRZG2ViRNKj61HrlhpxLWmNdCiWMhsWVhbm RdxyJH3FQduhIrHxwhoE66v5Th+ILgKCu2gMt4cIBsqhZUFem4FqnLhRdpiWMHwTcTQk 8hpg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+UWiulKXtT+KI1MFrM5e4GeSPgH9Fr5iVOoG3PkZcA5c2S47u nkvXXXiz/dIng7XM3FsoPNRoygu4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQDEOaub6x08imAn2lpQ+N1iCCnUTsI9A/nyGNYca8qTUPr5nXJHhnRdTLgbR1NNBCt2fhIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa96:: with SMTP id t144mr23709122qke.275.1568211277721; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([189.63.142.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r13sm5947585qkm.48.2019.09.11.07.14.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:14:31 -0300 From: Ricardo Biehl Pasquali To: Sasha Levin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree Message-ID: <20190911141431.GA21115@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190911093035.57F102089F@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190911093035.57F102089F@mail.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:30:33AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture > > to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > The filename of the patch is: > alsa-pcm-return-0-when-size-start_threshold-in-captu.patch > and it can be found in the queue-4.19 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > please let know about it. Hi Sasha. This patch was reverted by the commit 932a81519572156a88db ("ALSA: pcm: Comment why read blocks when PCM is not running"): This avoids bringing back the problem introduced by 62ba568f7aef ("ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture") and fixed in 00a399cad1a0 ("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in blocking mode"), which prevented the user from starting capture from another thread. Should this be queued anyway? If yes, I think it should also be queued the fix and the commit above. pasquali