From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CBEECDE20 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880AC20863 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="a8sNmPga" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726510AbfIKOUS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:20:18 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com ([209.85.222.175]:42761 "EHLO mail-qk1-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726012AbfIKOUR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:20:17 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id f13so20937156qkm.9 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xHRPEB+HwPgUl7AdHiN+kxNboVqbgioTe9SVuCIn0KU=; b=a8sNmPgaASgydnqo3Lh7B7L8QtrViGEdupvZ+LJNu28pl2VZbBSwrb2j/6CvcJu54N OioFdUX4zgHGVONxMvae/cVdDm2B7ZY+GGEihEle7+zHGr9RY5fkyQnEboqukj+kfO+W lnvtnB5SVGEM+1FrmXtgRzi/2r1CLRUgeTOnbzeAjJNaF4l6V8PLQ9v+ThlYOcG/zc46 2ScnC2zp/rR+4d0oT+vg49b5j4ZBuAbfFqxuxlZKzUE3OiPIM+2hTqZFilgFVcSg5Ewh WtrwQ0tLxo/nyk95aJg+oDCOxKkDBsZy5xOfzXGZ91JqMtCmNZWRKaKay3+JBVb4SNKe y2yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xHRPEB+HwPgUl7AdHiN+kxNboVqbgioTe9SVuCIn0KU=; b=RiGaMg/lsmJfnT69PykfRGebifd+hv6q1X9frrh/NZBN1Yd45+cVYCpMOxFR1SmnSs cxS0GzgDFaI9vyq11KHXcB3I4jIcl4wRZug8VlxAscEMsOBF9yls45wlv1Po/Hh/d9I/ TBpcxiaiy/hlaJZktJhimhaVjlQLHyeicD4xdcp7V3eFyAa8sjrpwWHhDMP+E7zZopsK 9O/x4m/Yu8+//LSkiPP4MlD4LAeiXgcLQVbdUgRF6/MIn8sP4iqfB9bZ6inB2SvxYKLy TxYU8jl/KIZFatIZG9uVol00CHPXrLOvVvuKCOMFfBPZjZSqhK9lbhirus0prOSUnd/9 BDhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXICoYN8qYrRVRetKM0TtRCa99y2GI9+xc4n+7F2iCNj/SxwKWL O7UQcVS0jKMiRAMLV5jM4mU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy48GOWpoz4JdmuA+ZAeQHVHmSlPApgXliKnZqjC9RVYavmiCAptOQU/keAzoqjHQKXKktYYg== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:ee09:: with SMTP id i9mr4679150qkg.438.1568211615773; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([189.63.142.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 44sm13343088qtu.45.2019.09.11.07.20.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 07:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:20:11 -0300 From: Ricardo Biehl Pasquali To: Sasha Levin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch "ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < start_threshold in capture" has been added to the 4.19-stable tree Message-ID: <20190911142011.GB21115@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190911093035.57F102089F@mail.kernel.org> <20190911141431.GA21115@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190911141431.GA21115@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:14:31AM -0300, Ricardo Biehl Pasquali wrote: > This patch was reverted by the commit 932a81519572156a88db > ("ALSA: pcm: Comment why read blocks when PCM is not > running"): Sorry. It was reverted by 00a399cad1a0 ("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in blocking mode"). The commit I mentioned just add a comment as described below: > > This avoids bringing back the problem introduced by > 62ba568f7aef ("ALSA: pcm: Return 0 when size < > start_threshold in capture") and fixed in 00a399cad1a0 > ("ALSA: pcm: Revert capture stream behavior change in > blocking mode"), which prevented the user from starting > capture from another thread.