From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF16C4CEC7 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349E8206BB for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:29:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568381398; bh=hR2M/dFU7q9mS8Hanp2YcelqgRGYy0EO55qfTzIOR1Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=hpY0MzyRjqxAXzRgtvu/8qzqCJIm1RHHi7GvT7G+E8xTrBlZAKeZJlWvn8JWcB4zw dnEeyomOmeQO//K5DatZEbhqhQ2jmfHaQ9h7mIl7Wvmz7ZvhQEO7RjqbmHZp4iYlsF HNBzCI/Y+NIGedCkPbw9KSHn/NFhie5jZi5Cj5tw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390178AbfIMNSV (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:18:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45804 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390188AbfIMNSS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:18:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.45.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14229206BB; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:18:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568380697; bh=hR2M/dFU7q9mS8Hanp2YcelqgRGYy0EO55qfTzIOR1Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ku+fKwnOCJI7wOzYWrcC+I81buU+pUXqlKQkdNRSs6/gTmDQ9zxoNi3v9JldpNCip T5rjqoqM+KO9JSsYIup75rADoQHITDuACo0nIfN1j9Y1GiTWmzT5b3X8+D4INEIAEJ 2sAkk1Oo9+/1KlycpOCYGBut+xc/5NKTh/e0jaso= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Block , Steffen Maier , Jens Remus , "Martin K. Petersen" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 148/190] scsi: zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing wrong traces Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:06:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20190913130611.803597120@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20190913130559.669563815@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190913130559.669563815@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit 106d45f350c7cac876844dc685845cba4ffdb70b ] When tracing instances where we open and close WKA ports, we also pass the request-ID of the respective FSF command. But after successfully sending the FSF command we must not use the request-object anymore, as this might result in an use-after-free (see "zfcp: fix request object use-after-free in send path causing seqno errors" ). To fix this add a new variable that caches the request-ID before sending the request. This won't change during the hand-off to the FCP channel, and so it's safe to trace this cached request-ID later, instead of using the request object. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block Fixes: d27a7cb91960 ("zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port") Cc: #2.6.38+ Reviewed-by: Steffen Maier Reviewed-by: Jens Remus Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index 3c86e27f094de..aff073a5b52bf 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) { struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio; struct zfcp_fsf_req *req; + unsigned long req_id = 0; int retval = -EIO; spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock); @@ -1616,6 +1617,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) hton24(req->qtcb->bottom.support.d_id, wka_port->d_id); req->data = wka_port; + req_id = req->req_id; + zfcp_fsf_start_timer(req, ZFCP_FSF_REQUEST_TIMEOUT); retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(req); if (retval) @@ -1623,7 +1626,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) out: spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock); if (!retval) - zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fsowp_1", wka_port, req->req_id); + zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fsowp_1", wka_port, req_id); return retval; } @@ -1649,6 +1652,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) { struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio; struct zfcp_fsf_req *req; + unsigned long req_id = 0; int retval = -EIO; spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock); @@ -1671,6 +1675,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) req->data = wka_port; req->qtcb->header.port_handle = wka_port->handle; + req_id = req->req_id; + zfcp_fsf_start_timer(req, ZFCP_FSF_REQUEST_TIMEOUT); retval = zfcp_fsf_req_send(req); if (retval) @@ -1678,7 +1684,7 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port) out: spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock); if (!retval) - zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fscwp_1", wka_port, req->req_id); + zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fscwp_1", wka_port, req_id); return retval; } -- 2.20.1