From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46610C3A5A6 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C3220640 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:30:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568932241; bh=9msoC85KjAkTZ+3NyTfzwtqHQ+ihqnOm2jDZUcXZ8B4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=B++4pvHEXk3rh/sYCk7aOO+OD8WQ9zBc8SyVSaOh7AxbKbPjWudhRmutmrtkZ9jiJ NJW6dDvwGabqhEdkf1yJdkw4hiDCObdqImsgnP+5H1Fr2STDZnupG8ilUCyzNuUzUN ng6dq5LK4PCvdvlHgmyW23EYQcMI6mM/Vg2qmiSs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406229AbfISWP5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:15:57 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56030 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406225AbfISWP5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:15:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A8F1217D6; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:15:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568931356; bh=9msoC85KjAkTZ+3NyTfzwtqHQ+ihqnOm2jDZUcXZ8B4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RU6k9RtDnYDp6hnwd/ZQXjTHN0yJgZgx8G9HsN6y8b0QC6BKSP3ukOQaAqn9jbsep L/Bl3jFSletAnzvRIsbsgKXb5uJm59QS7gve5aUpq5ulVxh5amdaSkwTscALLtRX8u uob3kmytgAgyUBehlhDJI6h3zDgYLiISgImleUXg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 17/59] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix omap4 errata warning on other SoCs Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:03:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20190919214801.116031978@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20190919214755.852282682@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190919214755.852282682@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Tony Lindgren [ Upstream commit 45da5e09dd32fa98c32eaafe2513db6bd75e2f4f ] We have errata i688 workaround produce warnings on SoCs other than omap4 and omap5: omap4_sram_init:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688 omap4_sram_init:Unable to get sram pool needed to handle errata I688 This is happening because there is no ti,omap4-mpu node, or no SRAM to configure for the other SoCs, so let's remove the warning based on the SoC revision checks. As nobody has complained it seems that the other SoC variants do not need this workaround. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c index cf65ab8bb0046..e5dcbda20129d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static int __init omap4_sram_init(void) struct device_node *np; struct gen_pool *sram_pool; + if (!soc_is_omap44xx() && !soc_is_omap54xx()) + return 0; + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ti,omap4-mpu"); if (!np) pr_warn("%s:Unable to allocate sram needed to handle errata I688\n", -- 2.20.1