From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CE7C10F14 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8291C222BE for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570118723; bh=bNImInskFkEsiy3tjaGLK/ZZjqJE5MRAbprW6BDTjo8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=foD4F6hBCVGWof0OZkwtmQs3RZxRS02ZHyWjz/8NbnaDyhXuFqcBsUAoQpPUf46SD dVUM1I5UAESF0rZbp7O1cC/vQH2c+tboyBL95zlgiNWzSiAnKsYicm984XztPNnTsa bKY95PZkP/hhn0nTkOvC6fUDoRmkrvIXmyzS//rk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732529AbfJCQFW (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:05:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51956 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731287AbfJCQFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:05:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B507C21D81; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:05:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570118721; bh=bNImInskFkEsiy3tjaGLK/ZZjqJE5MRAbprW6BDTjo8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uI/NerBSpMz0obLdb0ZvwOdcmk7fKcv0trBnQEqPugFkz0jtvoqX3ZERf4Ys3kzL/ w6swQyZ/YWNQ5A4hZfozUUkM9ft8vYepu/ubgSYIW1SH1j7XV4p0DEL3cGwUk8EDR0 VzQU0YuJNqJUxCpfr2anoYze7yNmsVb8biMdD7xE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo , Thomas Gleixner Subject: [PATCH 4.9 112/129] alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 17:53:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20191003154410.109449692@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20191003154318.081116689@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191003154318.081116689@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo commit f18ddc13af981ce3c7b7f26925f099e7c6929aba upstream. ENOTSUPP is not supposed to be returned to userspace. This was found on an OpenPower machine, where the RTC does not support set_alarm. On that system, a clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM, ...) results in "524 Unknown error 524" Replace it with EOPNOTSUPP which results in the expected "95 Operation not supported" error. Fixes: 1c6b39ad3f01 (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no RTC device is present) Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190903171802.28314-1-cascardo@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int alarm_timer_create(struct k_i enum alarmtimer_type type; if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; if (!capable(CAP_WAKE_ALARM)) return -EPERM; @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int alarm_timer_nsleep(const cloc struct restart_block *restart; if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev()) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; if (flags & ~TIMER_ABSTIME) return -EINVAL;