From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35328ECE58F for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048E52246A for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:04:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571177082; bh=bEz6VCO4JTI+Xylf3IoX+njYEaKlxKQAsOEkVTvjUNE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=C5AJA1wf0g6wVmnuJS/S1e4Sgibd3RdoTAodB3J3AGwnKAb9l18/PCZAEQVFY9POF VaaWVf0RiJZNeBT2Yl/m2ooZomALMt+vIdwNcELkkpwYKdP9xOWGc7gwQJzoC21B8G L0rcvpe230JJcuTstCUTaDrSwJQ/NxV5lGw+a6jA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388788AbfJOWEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38398 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387411AbfJOWEl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:04:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32B3F21A49; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:04:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571177080; bh=bEz6VCO4JTI+Xylf3IoX+njYEaKlxKQAsOEkVTvjUNE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e1xOJVfWV9ix0vZr4g+UcrmKP4/FNC6MKcH8FDdA/I5R3HIFxIYH2YeuXEgpaxUkC uaRVTzg8A/NYCb+zGNG1CgFiD6dzRlLj9y7QwNE++a3RWzzsXIZZq7hDJEXkQ1wJ1O mHHnBfUhy9zlgXC0SbhsSnKToKFyJAWmOPnAit4c= Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:04:39 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: John Garry Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, rrichter@marvell.com, jeremy.linton@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH for-stable-5.3 1/2] ACPI/PPTT: Add support for ACPI 6.3 thread flag Message-ID: <20191015220439.GQ31224@sasha-vm> References: <1571054162-71090-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1571054162-71090-2-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20191014232958.GC31224@sasha-vm> <635a839b-bc1e-37ab-bd47-a554acc9b282@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <635a839b-bc1e-37ab-bd47-a554acc9b282@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:16:13AM +0100, John Garry wrote: >On 15/10/2019 00:29, Sasha Levin wrote: >>On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:56:01PM +0800, John Garry wrote: >>>From: Jeremy Linton >>> >>>Commit bbd1b70639f785a970d998f35155c713f975e3ac upstream. >>> >>>ACPI 6.3 adds a flag to the CPU node to indicate whether >>>the given PE is a thread. Add a function to return that >>>information for a given linux logical CPU. >>> >>>Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton >>>Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla >>>Reviewed-by: Robert Richter >>>Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >>>Signed-off-by: Will Deacon >>>Signed-off-by: John Garry >> >>How far back should these patches be backported? >> > >Hi Sasha, > >This patchset is for 5.3, and I sent a separate patchset for 4.19, >since the backport is a little different and required some hand >modification - > >https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1571046986-231263-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com/. >4.19 is as far back as we want. > >Please note that the patches in this 5.3 series are relevant for 5.2 >also, but since 5.2 is EOL, I didn't mention it. We did test 5.2, so >you can add there also. > >Please let me know if any more questions. I've queued this and the 4.19 patches, thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha