From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3814CA9EAF for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AB620873 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:24:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572186259; bh=S2DU1zT1UHQpmjZkeY/YWa/bvw72t8qFIf9U80qmiDc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=WtRrfUj5f3CsdTJ4Wsc0r1gfMy3sFhNCQsJ5rmlz1OXQBLE8YdZ127BR3XDO6c7td enAHRDDTKdaGdDASfWNiCrQnSqRFfZUe8Z0gbZFsqekpU6KjGigsSn4JhBN04bV/0G CZylASui7NLZ2fZhAHWMXupJbry0I9BU2Lb7uQx0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726786AbfJ0OYT (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:24:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35182 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726541AbfJ0OYT (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:24:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (100.50.158.77.rev.sfr.net [77.158.50.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE44A20873; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:24:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572186258; bh=S2DU1zT1UHQpmjZkeY/YWa/bvw72t8qFIf9U80qmiDc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vm/KKD7I3Co7UOysKWVPUSidbYPY2l5xdNGIXPHW/PcFQaFvK9R+kbxp59U1h5GoD KAD9xv1T0p4IQabbEaJdn3WCJYG6g9AShmpNpwpRDNkg/tRIJjSybXyewUV+QvhPdR 5Clq9nT9qGV2OmlCp4A57wkXWeIP0ck2IlvzKM2I= Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:24:15 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Jens Axboe Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: io_uring stable 5.3 backports Message-ID: <20191027142415.GE1560@sasha-vm> References: <20191027085204.GA1560@sasha-vm> <20191027134832.GD1560@sasha-vm> <4dab77cb-0e29-15af-bb32-26ee23de3f69@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4dab77cb-0e29-15af-bb32-26ee23de3f69@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 08:03:09AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >On 10/27/19 7:48 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 06:01:03AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On 10/27/19 2:52 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 05:33:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> For some reason I forgot to mark these stable, but they should go >>>>> into stable. In order of applying them, they are: >>>>> >>>>> bc808bced39f4e4b626c5ea8c63d5e41fce7205a >>>> >>>> This commit says it fixes c576666863b78 ("io_uring: optimize >>>> submit_and_wait API") which is not in the stable tree. >>>> >>>>> ef03681ae8df770745978148a7fb84796ae99cba >>>> >>>> This commit doesn't say so, but really it fixes 5262f567987d3 >>>> ("io_uring: IORING_OP_TIMEOUT support") which is not in the stable tree. >>>> >>>>> a1f58ba46f794b1168d1107befcf3d4b9f9fd453 >>>> >>>> Same as the commit above. >>> >>> Oh man, sorry about that, I always forget to check if all of them are in >>> 5.3. I blame the fact that I backport everything to our internal tree, >>> which is 5.2 based. But yes, you are of course right, those three can be >>> dropped. >> >> How much "secret sauce" does your internal tree have? Is it something >> we can peek into to make sure we don't miss fixes? > >There's no secret sauce in the internal tree, it's just that I backport >everything into the 5.2 version that is our newest. It's fully uptodate >with 5.4-rc and in some cases what's queued up for 5.5 as well. Hence I >sometimes forget to check what is applicable to 5.3-stable, since I have >it in our 5.2 tree... > >The internal tree is just backports. That's how we do things. Could you push it somewhere public? I could automate grabbing fixes off of it. -- Thanks, Sasha