From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, guru2018@gmail.com, ntsironis@arrikto.com,
snitzer@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm snapshot: rework COW throttling to fix deadlock" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:38:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028143824.GA1554@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191028114657.GA7337@kroah.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:46:57PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:39:28AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 04:37:28PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>> >
>> > The patch below does not apply to the 5.3-stable tree.
>> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
>> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
>> > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>> >
>> > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>> >
>> > > From b21555786f18cd77f2311ad89074533109ae3ffa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 06:15:53 -0400
>> > Subject: [PATCH] dm snapshot: rework COW throttling to fix deadlock
>> >
>> > Commit 721b1d98fb517a ("dm snapshot: Fix excessive memory usage and
>> > workqueue stalls") introduced a semaphore to limit the maximum number of
>> > in-flight kcopyd (COW) jobs.
>> >
>> > The implementation of this throttling mechanism is prone to a deadlock:
>> >
>> > 1. One or more threads write to the origin device causing COW, which is
>> > performed by kcopyd.
>> >
>> > 2. At some point some of these threads might reach the s->cow_count
>> > semaphore limit and block in down(&s->cow_count), holding a read lock
>> > on _origins_lock.
>> >
>> > 3. Someone tries to acquire a write lock on _origins_lock, e.g.,
>> > snapshot_ctr(), which blocks because the threads at step (2) already
>> > hold a read lock on it.
>> >
>> > 4. A COW operation completes and kcopyd runs dm-snapshot's completion
>> > callback, which ends up calling pending_complete().
>> > pending_complete() tries to resubmit any deferred origin bios. This
>> > requires acquiring a read lock on _origins_lock, which blocks.
>> >
>> > This happens because the read-write semaphore implementation gives
>> > priority to writers, meaning that as soon as a writer tries to enter
>> > the critical section, no readers will be allowed in, until all
>> > writers have completed their work.
>> >
>> > So, pending_complete() waits for the writer at step (3) to acquire
>> > and release the lock. This writer waits for the readers at step (2)
>> > to release the read lock and those readers wait for
>> > pending_complete() (the kcopyd thread) to signal the s->cow_count
>> > semaphore: DEADLOCK.
>> >
>> > The above was thoroughly analyzed and documented by Nikos Tsironis as
>> > part of his initial proposal for fixing this deadlock, see:
>> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2019-October/msg00001.html
>> >
>> > Fix this deadlock by reworking COW throttling so that it waits without
>> > holding any locks. Add a variable 'in_progress' that counts how many
>> > kcopyd jobs are running. A function wait_for_in_progress() will sleep if
>> > 'in_progress' is over the limit. It drops _origins_lock in order to
>> > avoid the deadlock.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Guruswamy Basavaiah <guru2018@gmail.com>
>> > Reported-by: Nikos Tsironis <ntsironis@arrikto.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Nikos Tsironis <ntsironis@arrikto.com>
>> > Tested-by: Nikos Tsironis <ntsironis@arrikto.com>
>> > Fixes: 721b1d98fb51 ("dm snapshot: Fix excessive memory usage and workqueue stalls")
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.0+
>> > Depends-on: 4a3f111a73a8c ("dm snapshot: introduce account_start_copy() and account_end_copy()")
>> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>>
>> Grabbing the listed dependency solved it for 5.3-4.19. For 4.14 and
>> older I've also grabbed the semaphore->mutex conversion.
>
>Ugh, I missed that it said that there. I'll do this for 4.19, unless
>you have these ready to go for when the tree "opens up" again.
I'll have all of these ready to go when the tree opens up.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-27 15:37 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] dm snapshot: rework COW throttling to fix deadlock" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree gregkh
2019-10-28 9:39 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-28 11:46 ` Greg KH
2019-10-28 14:38 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-10-28 14:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-10-28 15:34 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028143824.GA1554@sasha-vm \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guru2018@gmail.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=ntsironis@arrikto.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).