From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5AACA9ED3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64BE21D71 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:52:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572904331; bh=BT5g7okK7GOY7awUj1RlSha07wwJtV+TgL6wEfrCD0Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=l6JwNN44iMVQJ1xIIcEu5rQ1uSfDSmVztehg+DPnO8tVa1G7WuuNDJqgTcRHTcYuo vOtZ3j3sOHz4l9p3ldX5AhnNDPac57i1jB+P79zm4uO89DGjfddu4/ITwE89Ih8Ypo UVUg0VavILsvYeNH3Ymd3YSGdslKNbC5x8R4FThQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730301AbfKDVwK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:52:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45472 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730221AbfKDVwK (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:52:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (6.204-14-84.ripe.coltfrance.com [84.14.204.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F04C62184C; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:52:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572904329; bh=BT5g7okK7GOY7awUj1RlSha07wwJtV+TgL6wEfrCD0Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JX/m7e44ETkJW0PHd1d3XvSunr22qtMAjEHJgNlgrZyZn9RTxpt5x0H/tyxwov7UH QVMx/IHNoLg11hqPeGPzUuuawsdX4lr9TBo8rpAM5RyUHCo9SGbzGlqSItga9iPEnt C7mUeRO/G0C3P1icY7F0vB6LDNdZQvxY34R3zg1o= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , Jason Gunthorpe , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 17/62] RDMA/iwcm: Fix a lock inversion issue Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:44:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20191104211918.043711182@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20191104211901.387893698@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191104211901.387893698@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Bart Van Assche [ Upstream commit b66f31efbdad95ec274345721d99d1d835e6de01 ] This patch fixes the lock inversion complaint: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.3.0-rc7-dbg+ #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u16:6/171 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000035c6e6c (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: rdma_destroy_id+0x78/0x4a0 [rdma_cm] but task is already holding lock: 00000000bc7c307d (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: iw_conn_req_handler+0x151/0x680 [rdma_cm] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex); lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by kworker/u16:6/171: #0: 00000000e2eaa773 ((wq_completion)iw_cm_wq){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x472/0xac0 #1: 000000001efd357b ((work_completion)(&work->work)#3){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x476/0xac0 #2: 00000000bc7c307d (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: iw_conn_req_handler+0x151/0x680 [rdma_cm] stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 171 Comm: kworker/u16:6 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7-dbg+ #1 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Workqueue: iw_cm_wq cm_work_handler [iw_cm] Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8a/0xd6 __lock_acquire.cold+0xe1/0x24d lock_acquire+0x106/0x240 __mutex_lock+0x12e/0xcb0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 rdma_destroy_id+0x78/0x4a0 [rdma_cm] iw_conn_req_handler+0x5c9/0x680 [rdma_cm] cm_work_handler+0xe62/0x1100 [iw_cm] process_one_work+0x56d/0xac0 worker_thread+0x7a/0x5d0 kthread+0x1bc/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 This is not a bug as there are actually two lock classes here. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190930231707.48259-3-bvanassche@acm.org Fixes: de910bd92137 ("RDMA/cma: Simplify locking needed for serialization of callbacks") Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c index 85d4ef319c905..dcfbf326f45c9 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c @@ -2119,9 +2119,10 @@ static int iw_conn_req_handler(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id, conn_id->cm_id.iw = NULL; cma_exch(conn_id, RDMA_CM_DESTROYING); mutex_unlock(&conn_id->handler_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&listen_id->handler_mutex); cma_deref_id(conn_id); rdma_destroy_id(&conn_id->id); - goto out; + return ret; } mutex_unlock(&conn_id->handler_mutex); -- 2.20.1