From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64118C432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DFA2072D for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:47:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574419663; bh=Zgkwqrff4/iY33NyPBf0FfOVn1J4uPqkRyaGWhNjPxM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=toX0IvnIDvNiewN9Ew6JWuRdUWSdWqD79cjm7lZHXXallXXkwVX1mNqT0Kx+bo5Xl 7wbaYpmbuSmDUecqbDMX5u1AcWnxUvfDln7mE2lRDIC5BXd8IncBbTvXajYh+hm+SM o2DF+0jBsGl7LCRvH7j6hn8q64gJxsgZ+0CNeAHM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729083AbfKVKrl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:47:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55712 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729797AbfKVKrk (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 05:47:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E821720637; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:47:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574419659; bh=Zgkwqrff4/iY33NyPBf0FfOVn1J4uPqkRyaGWhNjPxM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Rca6HGeiEXMG/vGT+mXRsvU0k/6tryAmflqgKqrneSWOXS1nE6w0JZDh8xOcmwiwM kXqmKOkdkD/7h5ajMi/pbSq01IRJ8nHUlrEtrP1ymW/3NFiGq7CCq7XXinULGJD84i g90WR8CPBl8G3tocBIcIoX1dH4iBEtXCh5gHGM0M= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 188/222] clk: samsung: Use clk_hw API for calling clk framework from clk notifiers Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:28:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20191122100915.891944996@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191122100830.874290814@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191122100830.874290814@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Marek Szyprowski [ Upstream commit 1da220e3a5d22fccda0bc8542997abc1d1741268 ] clk_notifier_register() documentation states, that the provided notifier callbacks associated with the notifier must not re-enter into the clk framework by calling any top-level clk APIs. Fix this by replacing clk_get_rate() calls with clk_hw_get_rate(), which is safe in this context. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c | 6 +++--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c index 8bf7e805fd349..1271315b0c25b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.c @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int exynos_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata, struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk, void __iomem *base) { const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg_data = cpuclk->cfg; - unsigned long alt_prate = clk_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent); + unsigned long alt_prate = clk_hw_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent); unsigned long alt_div = 0, alt_div_mask = DIV_MASK; unsigned long div0, div1 = 0, mux_reg; unsigned long flags; @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int exynos5433_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct clk_notifier_data *ndata, struct exynos_cpuclk *cpuclk, void __iomem *base) { const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg_data = cpuclk->cfg; - unsigned long alt_prate = clk_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent); + unsigned long alt_prate = clk_hw_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent); unsigned long alt_div = 0, alt_div_mask = DIV_MASK; unsigned long div0, div1 = 0, mux_reg; unsigned long flags; @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ int __init exynos_register_cpu_clock(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx, else cpuclk->clk_nb.notifier_call = exynos_cpuclk_notifier_cb; - cpuclk->alt_parent = __clk_lookup(alt_parent); + cpuclk->alt_parent = __clk_get_hw(__clk_lookup(alt_parent)); if (!cpuclk->alt_parent) { pr_err("%s: could not lookup alternate parent %s\n", __func__, alt_parent); diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h index d4b6b517fe1b4..bd38c6aa38970 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-cpu.h @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data { */ struct exynos_cpuclk { struct clk_hw hw; - struct clk *alt_parent; + struct clk_hw *alt_parent; void __iomem *ctrl_base; spinlock_t *lock; const struct exynos_cpuclk_cfg_data *cfg; -- 2.20.1