From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3FC2D0CE for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65586222C3 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:55:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577642105; bh=mm9Jzp1MQhRaACJ7gkpP5EbpTipjhlRnBEMgtQa5KKk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=xFC94bmhwVbx3HCIJcrlP/uIc4fP/qmPN759UsL610rO0RbKz/e3a/kSDgLjQDAZG WzmuHF39QlBla7JiVCL+iG610ZVhALABKTNUT3WewBjZskqw86pWg0ERKykRFZbf21 cWP0ok0yB4eL1LkI4EEkDfx1UFAu4AF9VYM0oKFM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732364AbfL2RzE (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 12:55:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43370 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732801AbfL2RzC (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 12:55:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9170A206A4; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:55:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577642101; bh=mm9Jzp1MQhRaACJ7gkpP5EbpTipjhlRnBEMgtQa5KKk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gsL+gLXcTbyxxCVZtk+R8HkB40cj+8csQG9njCOdBBYInFi5szJUYBLHE8XLfQMSJ uee87UKoNwOfI00FrDch+sU+rBL22Oifq58Ax3c58tkD2bAibTflcjq3MIRqGKli+L xe3dyMluueuNyTsSPV1Y4HL3FG+UWz4BlqNFkovM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Corentin Labbe , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 343/434] crypto: sun4i-ss - Fix 64-bit size_t warnings Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:26:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20191229172724.754000564@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20191229172702.393141737@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191229172702.393141737@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu [ Upstream commit d6e9da21ee8246b5e556b3b153401ab045adb986 ] If you try to compile this driver on a 64-bit platform then you will get warnings because it mixes size_t with unsigned int which only works on 32-bit. This patch fixes all of the warnings. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Acked-by: Corentin Labbe Tested-by: Corentin Labbe Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c index 6536fd4bee65..7e5e092a23b3 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ static int noinline_for_stack sun4i_ss_opti_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) oi = 0; oo = 0; do { - todo = min3(rx_cnt, ileft, (mi.length - oi) / 4); + todo = min(rx_cnt, ileft); + todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mi.length - oi) / 4); if (todo) { ileft -= todo; writesl(ss->base + SS_RXFIFO, mi.addr + oi, todo); @@ -87,7 +88,8 @@ static int noinline_for_stack sun4i_ss_opti_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) rx_cnt = SS_RXFIFO_SPACES(spaces); tx_cnt = SS_TXFIFO_SPACES(spaces); - todo = min3(tx_cnt, oleft, (mo.length - oo) / 4); + todo = min(tx_cnt, oleft); + todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mo.length - oo) / 4); if (todo) { oleft -= todo; readsl(ss->base + SS_TXFIFO, mo.addr + oo, todo); @@ -239,7 +241,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) * todo is the number of consecutive 4byte word that we * can read from current SG */ - todo = min3(rx_cnt, ileft / 4, (mi.length - oi) / 4); + todo = min(rx_cnt, ileft / 4); + todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mi.length - oi) / 4); if (todo && !ob) { writesl(ss->base + SS_RXFIFO, mi.addr + oi, todo); @@ -253,8 +256,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) * we need to be able to write all buf in one * pass, so it is why we min() with rx_cnt */ - todo = min3(rx_cnt * 4 - ob, ileft, - mi.length - oi); + todo = min(rx_cnt * 4 - ob, ileft); + todo = min_t(size_t, todo, mi.length - oi); memcpy(buf + ob, mi.addr + oi, todo); ileft -= todo; oi += todo; @@ -274,7 +277,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) spaces = readl(ss->base + SS_FCSR); rx_cnt = SS_RXFIFO_SPACES(spaces); tx_cnt = SS_TXFIFO_SPACES(spaces); - dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%x %u/%u %u/%u cnt=%u %u/%u %u/%u cnt=%u %u\n", + dev_dbg(ss->dev, + "%x %u/%zu %u/%u cnt=%u %u/%zu %u/%u cnt=%u %u\n", mode, oi, mi.length, ileft, areq->cryptlen, rx_cnt, oo, mo.length, oleft, areq->cryptlen, tx_cnt, ob); @@ -282,7 +286,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) if (!tx_cnt) continue; /* todo in 4bytes word */ - todo = min3(tx_cnt, oleft / 4, (mo.length - oo) / 4); + todo = min(tx_cnt, oleft / 4); + todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mo.length - oo) / 4); if (todo) { readsl(ss->base + SS_TXFIFO, mo.addr + oo, todo); oleft -= todo * 4; @@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq) * no more than remaining buffer * no need to test against oleft */ - todo = min(mo.length - oo, obl - obo); + todo = min_t(size_t, + mo.length - oo, obl - obo); memcpy(mo.addr + oo, bufo + obo, todo); oleft -= todo; obo += todo; -- 2.20.1