From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56478C2D0C2 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E76A206E4 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kvSE8e04" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727054AbfLaQFV (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:05:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:42988 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726060AbfLaQFV (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:05:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id s64so19677169pgb.9; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=dZaUCr3Um0xyE02aIvLQxiiEoVv7ulqi8PdjiTC5+V4=; b=kvSE8e04W687RV4AR3dk1U2zNYKnv9Xyc1mwBFE2DcPg5wlfeQ0Pmawn2VeXcM6msA 9CmhHV9b7LalazQrjS2DmQerMXCxdlhNX4g3mJE3WCOkzuKb+5X8ZYLCNYPKI0B9JIqa OWid8hgaFRb6qYduW5kPS3jbuSZAV7+lI9IrwMYtpVBpsi6JzCx1jgkHVdULaAWMxDaD gzgymDLcMbaCArnTkXhVIC/Bt5Itel7SYGpsiCVZs6faxaWtAhNIcIlzEcnuqxIFfT24 AZtUbk9gBEfNdc17chwPKry/pmkPkiW2DD0O0VR7s5AEn2ANJHRp2ftXZw6eKD692Kq/ c3Bw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=dZaUCr3Um0xyE02aIvLQxiiEoVv7ulqi8PdjiTC5+V4=; b=oWZEy2qO/qyFr5vlI9oUUEn2o4QooNqbsCaAaZWsUdHncVCYMokBkgZlfu3C9Bs+XV Ybbl8nhEkUhj4SIn51XoQSHQok+5JoU2WPnnbRlafWpPOhH0yLzDA9qLBAPIwUYybsWH vYQthQO48GfuD9oFU3dN26RvOQO+kW8Ss3sR4LeO7frJBGFq3d3yHXG2nF2ty/HDui3e ai5NMaBjYpykf1XMBoxrHDu7c9NXbZE+TOncN5wgltfAH0X6KFWK4npyMabj3OyHkiO+ gb9kGYRUEfKzDCpfbjMXAoYIrEwkR+lXkWTEt7v1Uegkp0+lF1j4WMamWxXzi75jjsPA jshQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrP55pjFMmQMfgciKgunPwjmEx6eC/O9bKaGmG9va1BpNuOw4Q Q0OsA6zbYSuyUHTsIqB9kaI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkStj6MF1s721UKZMK4XJ6CYf9/POYglgHpWgNUchUnTrrKuk13YKoFTI3jplt2ITu/gdWjw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:855a:: with SMTP id y26mr75155414pfn.175.1577808320686; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm53489176pfi.80.2019.12.31.08.05.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:19 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/219] 4.19.92-stable review Message-ID: <20191231160519.GB11542@roeck-us.net> References: <20191229162508.458551679@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191229162508.458551679@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:16:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.92 release. > There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:17:25 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. For -rc2: Build results: total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 381 pass: 376 fail: 5 Failed tests: ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:initrd ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:ide:rootfs ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:sdhci:mmc:rootfs ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:nvme:rootfs ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs Bug-for-bug compatible with mainline. That makes me wonder if I should stop testing those ppc images instead of being annoyed by the failures. Thoughts ? Guenter