From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PLING_QUERY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BF9C32771 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B6A2075D for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VupQPDUF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730055AbgAILz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:55:26 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:38985 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729130AbgAILzZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:55:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y11so7091537wrt.6; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 03:55:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mFkJFYkrFDlWwhK3VKXDGs8jHD7xXTyu7e9TssfROcw=; b=VupQPDUFRW6nGI/fzWa+ImG6XxRsc/hamERXHTC1dosaWxKNgdAbWQDk0HOMqzR66F +2dhGR+dnG6oMn7gR22cxPsacp8CL5RP63fJFGXzFeQ+4apuOHZL+lHxNifRs8OQnJg1 E+otA/VR0s0acLtclp9GbEySjXdImnzLwESx+PL/+SoIpENiFYmczifnTPlZgwr9MYDc SZC7aUgd7yxZif/HC4+zpmRUYOQMviQpQdqPK/fgF4hlQ5W7tl7ZCE5iOxkoOyWA01c1 s7/jp7cpF86j/jZ2mjNHNi8TPPegY78m8Q2gbP0afcYMGZZ05ADgKsoX1OtyxB4Bxkjg gUZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mFkJFYkrFDlWwhK3VKXDGs8jHD7xXTyu7e9TssfROcw=; b=IBx+/0OQxcLiYOYI43+yn5aArRtLY50ckQ1ZRtV6OJ0D6oageu/+DHbaVU0D5NESQ4 PLJwfYD5EmHSs390pxrzvaxcIiW/0/IOUQeKGJK3lhqc1+s1sHeRVrbt3XR+SksuukX+ PlXwIqafvC9nS8mjmsHCnWwaGHil3NINsm/REFCx8v50yi1jNQ8Q5GXVPc/bGw+/Aph+ fZxgQxlUWxBjBDZ6A91+Uij+rL4t7VZfXlxC8yxOpL/WKSHgAAy2BP7El3LFZfNVPM+h EFpiqSK2EGGr76CsqTziwSIRMXO5q+pR7sSu//j2l5JDC4bD0tRve0iBP97Ek4B35Jql Cc0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUF+qnB8B6Jc1rVf+E9Wtxi1to/VZCLh2bMWh6XuLz8l4bMFK9u sx9C6kiRhtgISLZ/E+8IWcZQwhGf6+w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzZdiDmnWeIjKl6Zs3UBhHThSKFOQFbH9wX9X39v5aH1m8oz0pIqOBHZJxJHGAj4woPe0HMbQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d0c1:: with SMTP id z1mr10906394wrh.371.1578570923526; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 03:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lorien (lorien.valinor.li. [2a01:4f8:192:61d5::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm3634075wmh.3.2020.01.09.03.55.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 03:55:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:55:21 +0100 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Bhaskar Chowdhury Cc: StableKernel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: What happend to 5.4.9??? Kernel.org showing 5.4.10!! Message-ID: <20200109115514.GA1270@lorien.valinor.li> References: <20200109114330.GC19235@Gentoo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200109114330.GC19235@Gentoo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 05:13:32PM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > I am wondering, it might be lack of morning coffee for Greg :) 5.4.10 contains one followup, backport of 6f4679b95674 ("powerpc/pmem: Fix kernel crash due to wrong range value usage in flush_dcache_range") which fixes a regression introduced in 5.4.9 via backport of 076265907cf9 ("powerpc: Chunk calls to flush_dcache_range in arch_*_memory"). Regards, Salvatore