From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE08C35254 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A8621D7D for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:45:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580913908; bh=94GkFpBxAel3ql0NTweeMe/aQbZ1pXa5A68amsyF/dI=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID: From; b=eZZBQ+JydMU8EVQIaGdOAahu3aIiQ/XOld1GuasZUmRCrxsSmdPTAV/HTFMRSD7wL WHPFpnoCwF7IL/riRhLC3kBdnkegqDIbbuIGBMOACJ5Z0R6+KgMWNl8zU9JneDifr4 cxcCsLfbWDkDK8t65cUlYLezGilCbQhWSz/jxHug= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726208AbgBEOpI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:45:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37844 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726543AbgBEOpH (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:45:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [137.135.114.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31F5F218AC; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:45:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580913907; bh=94GkFpBxAel3ql0NTweeMe/aQbZ1pXa5A68amsyF/dI=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EUsbTdUHALsNvSgloGkVsnike7amrg5DZDnAKzKroS2IRP9EaoIo+GpzX2c5bDuc8 vV1jE2oOC/MQx5CMCa4h0KHMb1x5TZl+vMGKxuR5kpKtJ4sqdBPoTtfhZC1HFjayN4 QKLV2ozcGJwgbWYqgKy5Wgxj5JbJCksQThc2BGWk= Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:45:06 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: Filipe Manana To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between using extent maps and merging them In-Reply-To: <20200131140607.26923-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> References: <20200131140607.26923-1-fdmanana@kernel.org> Message-Id: <20200205144507.31F5F218AC@mail.kernel.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: 4.4+ The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.1, v5.4.17, v4.19.101, v4.14.169, v4.9.212, v4.4.212. v5.5.1: Build OK! v5.4.17: Build OK! v4.19.101: Build OK! v4.14.169: Build OK! v4.9.212: Build failed! Errors: fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:238:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘refcount_read’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.4.212: Build failed! Errors: fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:238:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘refcount_read’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha