* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix race between using extent maps and merging them
[not found] <20200131140607.26923-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>
@ 2020-02-05 14:45 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-02-05 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, Filipe Manana, linux-btrfs; +Cc: stable
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: 4.4+
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.1, v5.4.17, v4.19.101, v4.14.169, v4.9.212, v4.4.212.
v5.5.1: Build OK!
v5.4.17: Build OK!
v4.19.101: Build OK!
v4.14.169: Build OK!
v4.9.212: Build failed! Errors:
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:238:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘refcount_read’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
v4.4.212: Build failed! Errors:
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:238:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘refcount_read’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread