From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Vikash Bansal <bvikas@vmware.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Bhat <srivatsab@vmware.com>,
"srivatsa@csail.mit.edu" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
Srinidhi Rao <srinidhir@vmware.com>,
Anish Swaminathan <anishs@vmware.com>,
Vasavi Sirnapalli <vsirnapalli@vmware.com>,
Sharath George <sharathg@vmware.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@vmware.com>,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.19.y, v4.14.y, v4.9.y] crypto: drbg - add FIPS 140-2 CTRNG for noise source
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:02:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200229190239.GB832132@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87EC78FF-21EE-4921-B819-CBA4D328E159@vmware.com>
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:01:49AM +0000, Vikash Bansal wrote:
>
> On 27/02/20, 12:30 PM, "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 05:58:05AM +0000, Vikash Bansal wrote:
> >> From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
> >>
> >> commit db07cd26ac6a418dc2823187958edcfdb415fa83 upstream
> >>
> >> FIPS 140-2 section 4.9.2 requires a continuous self test of the noise
> >> source. Up to kernel 4.8 drivers/char/random.c provided this continuous
> >> self test. Afterwards it was moved to a location that is inconsistent
> >> with the FIPS 140-2 requirements. The relevant patch was
> >> e192be9d9a30555aae2ca1dc3aad37cba484cd4a .
> >>
> >> Thus, the FIPS 140-2 CTRNG is added to the DRBG when it obtains the
> >> seed. This patch resurrects the function drbg_fips_continous_test that
> >> existed some time ago and applies it to the noise sources. The patch
> >> that removed the drbg_fips_continous_test was
> >> b3614763059b82c26bdd02ffcb1c016c1132aad0 .
> >>
> >> The Jitter RNG implements its own FIPS 140-2 self test and thus does not
> >> need to be subjected to the test in the DRBG.
> >>
> >> The patch contains a tiny fix to ensure proper zeroization in case of an
> >> error during the Jitter RNG data gathering.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
> >> Reviewed-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vikash Bansal <bvikas@vmware.com>
> >> ---
> >> crypto/drbg.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> include/crypto/drbg.h | 2 +
> >> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > This looks like a new feature to me, why is it needed in the stable
> > kernel trees? What bug does it fix?
>
> In 4.19.y, 4.14.y & 4.9.y, DRBG implementation is as per NIST recommendation
> defined in NIST SP800-9A and it designed to be ready for FIPS certification.
> But it has missed one of the NIST test requirement define in FIPS 140-2(4.9.2),
> so it is not ready for NIST FIPS certification.
> With this patch FIPS 140-2(4.9.2) continuous test requirement will be fulfilled.
Then use 5.4 or newer kernels if you need such a certification. Adding
this new feature to older kernels is just that, a new feature.
What is preventing you from using 5.4? It's much better security wise
than older kernels for a whole load of reasons.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-29 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 5:58 [PATCH v4.19.y, v4.14.y, v4.9.y] crypto: drbg - add FIPS 140-2 CTRNG for noise source Vikash Bansal
2020-02-27 7:00 ` Greg KH
2020-02-29 10:01 ` Vikash Bansal
2020-02-29 19:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-03-04 17:15 ` Vikash Bansal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200229190239.GB832132@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akaher@vmware.com \
--cc=amakhalov@vmware.com \
--cc=anishs@vmware.com \
--cc=bvikas@vmware.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sharathg@vmware.com \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=srinidhir@vmware.com \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=srivatsab@vmware.com \
--cc=srostedt@vmware.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vsirnapalli@vmware.com \
--cc=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).