From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2477C1975A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2AF20754 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584484228; bh=u91BC3NXkPdPIVBTn/xMmycQLs8sWQ1e5NtnOF5IDVo=; h=Date:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID: From; b=nPSvQsX0F10dPnK6TNiCGeLjPyGQ3XkIfy5nkuImy+l4rB+aBEb07Nw8p2Kw6cDsU SAad3gZAIubXVvo0B6etHOlQjNebjlTP42onFDSXpUvh+KN9fVEexhjU+XnMDFNTBz Gm7I28fmggomOC/uwov+H1JvrI419TnWKgLDw1SU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727132AbgCQWa2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:30:28 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38850 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727232AbgCQWa1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:30:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [137.135.114.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3623120409; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:30:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584484227; bh=u91BC3NXkPdPIVBTn/xMmycQLs8sWQ1e5NtnOF5IDVo=; h=Date:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nBbMhx0SmUy5n0wd7DtRTrr1cMsQPPg3Ooi3vYddcp4QPxU+x3dFRJpY4LMel8UO1 W441wVJIKv+DdtOiz35F987n0LAjAZ8ow0pFdtPXGsD2VUg9mdo28hniga9E+pTasA hw21CTeljUPpXcEMs2tKsB3suOXL1Fmx81ORqMgI= Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:30:26 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hans de Goede Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: x86/timers] x86/tsc_msr: Use named struct initializers In-Reply-To: <158396431730.28353.16602854182721546383.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> References: <158396431730.28353.16602854182721546383.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> Message-Id: <20200317223027.3623120409@mail.kernel.org> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.9, v5.4.25, v4.19.109, v4.14.173, v4.9.216, v4.4.216. v5.5.9: Build OK! v5.4.25: Build OK! v4.19.109: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0cc5359d8fd4 ("x86/cpu: Update init data for new Airmont CPU model") bba10c5cab4d ("x86/cpu: Use constant definitions for CPU models") v4.14.173: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0cc5359d8fd4 ("x86/cpu: Update init data for new Airmont CPU model") 397d3ad18dc4 ("x86/tsc: Convert to use x86_match_cpu() and INTEL_CPU_FAM6()") bba10c5cab4d ("x86/cpu: Use constant definitions for CPU models") v4.9.216: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0cc5359d8fd4 ("x86/cpu: Update init data for new Airmont CPU model") 397d3ad18dc4 ("x86/tsc: Convert to use x86_match_cpu() and INTEL_CPU_FAM6()") bba10c5cab4d ("x86/cpu: Use constant definitions for CPU models") v4.4.216: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 05680e7fa8a4 ("x86/tsc_msr: Correct Silvermont reference clock values") 0cc5359d8fd4 ("x86/cpu: Update init data for new Airmont CPU model") 397d3ad18dc4 ("x86/tsc: Convert to use x86_match_cpu() and INTEL_CPU_FAM6()") 6fcb41cdaee5 ("x86/tsc_msr: Add Airmont reference clock values") 9e0cae9f6227 ("x86/tsc_msr: Update comments, expand definitions") ba8268330dc1 ("x86/tsc_msr: Identify Intel-specific code") bba10c5cab4d ("x86/cpu: Use constant definitions for CPU models") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks Sasha