From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B31AC4332B for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81CB2076E for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:47:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584715620; bh=EkWxp6DOsISjV04sDISIAHdyAJaajF7MydZzKwlbcuQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=SfG0c6db/O3Mwu3UgagbsDOE58Z3aKDz8NEedQQSJu6y7Id0aMWeGodSU7EKba0pa OeUXoYoDkOCbUDH+3tB9CUzBH50PRbGZnFtYLuOdgRzJSTII0myq/yIwMSuLd78eJj tqkbkPnMml/D7fvuU86rtQUhSB9Wa894fqzzAwLA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726970AbgCTOrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:47:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40046 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726913AbgCTOrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:47:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 326BD20714; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:46:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584715619; bh=EkWxp6DOsISjV04sDISIAHdyAJaajF7MydZzKwlbcuQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W7LjqDAg8NykX6zsT1JTH+tARE5M4KboA4UGxmkUj0wIpzzJEBJwfL/9AWnVgJTD1 /2hMIzIvD/GmLKIN3xvUnbQ7kuxao9s+6dP0ZcWvT8jQw2wq+/X/YtBFBOXRdoLvuf mlbqM3Kb+yHUAaRpq6K7R0hWTiAlKy87UBvitK6M= Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:46:58 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hao Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 00/65] 5.5.11-rc1 review Message-ID: <20200320144658.GK4189@sasha-vm> References: <20200319123926.466988514@linuxfoundation.org> <20200319145900.GC92193@kroah.com> <32c627bf-0e6b-8bc4-88d3-032a69484aa6@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32c627bf-0e6b-8bc4-88d3-032a69484aa6@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:15:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >On 3/19/20 7:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:44:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 3/19/20 6:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.11 release. >>>> There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>> >>> arm:davinci_all_defconfig fails to build. >>> >>> include/linux/gpio/driver.h: In function 'gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_twocell': >>> include/linux/gpio/driver.h:552:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type] >>> 552 | } >>> >>> The problem is caused by commit 8db6a5905e98 ("gpiolib: Add support for the >>> irqdomain which doesn't use irq_fwspec as arg") which is missing its fix, >>> commit 9c6722d85e922 ("gpio: Fix the no return statement warning"). That one >>> is missing a Fixes: tag, providing a good example why such tags are desirable. >> >> Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped that patch (others >> complained about it for other reasons) and will push out a -rc2 with >> that fix. >> > >I did wonder why the offending patch was included, but then I figured that >I lost the "we apply too many patches to stable releases" battle, and I didn't >want to re-litigate it. I usually much rather take prerequisite patches rather than do backports, which is why that patch was selected. -- Thanks, Sasha