From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3BC2D0E7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F4D2080C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:21:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585729296; bh=btOKXSGf76FBzOEt5fSGzQ5RZEDzDZ4bhHY+Uwrci3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wJodwsCNjc0jBkelfttZSp+QnKK+ACcK2mrILSk0vzQwVjsSHWfdewNGSSkNaAhWF biPqB7pQ9FwjN6+webzsd06hlNJ9vC3OOvQV/NvE/cKXdbySnnvOAJgsIEXVtuA0lX g/6DzZQFKGWKq0RZ6RYtnDkWPcClNZILVhArRAuI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732064AbgDAIVf (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 04:21:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43124 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729703AbgDAIVe (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 04:21:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35EEF2078B; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:21:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585729293; bh=btOKXSGf76FBzOEt5fSGzQ5RZEDzDZ4bhHY+Uwrci3o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=F7BsK5jNFRn+yLZvfpo2cl4bjYIcY40dMDqH1UJUEhiK0u+AORKhlHlmz7RGPz6NZ bh04s7asofV/FE2OhzpMcuGnl2iryzHWYyrgy/W0lUQmcZU6VmbR3zW+nMZH3pksD6 /DLvC8rxkjExqHzDv5UbUDBjWnNsn3GCl0kwX9jQ= Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:21:31 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Christoph Hellwig , Linus Walleij , Ludovic Barre , "# 4.0+" Subject: Re: patch "driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms for platform devices" added to char-misc-testing Message-ID: <20200401082131.GA2023796@kroah.com> References: <158523473532132@kroah.com> <20200401060720.GA1904908@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 08:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:43:25PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 15:58, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > > > > > driver core: platform: Initialize dma_parms for platform devices > > > > > > > > to my char-misc git tree which can be found at > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git > > > > in the char-misc-testing branch. > > > > > > > > The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree > > > > (usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.) > > > > > > > > The patch will be merged to the char-misc-next branch sometime soon, > > > > after it passes testing, and the merge window is open. > > > > > > > > If you have any questions about this process, please let me know. > > > > > > Greg, would you mind dropping this one and the other patch for the amba bus? > > > > > > I just sent out a new version (v2), addressing an issue for the > > > platform device when used for OF based platforms. > > > > > > If you prefer to not rebase/drop patches from your branch, I can send > > > an incremental change on top instead, whatever you prefer. > > > > I will just revert these and then send it all on to Linus later today. > > That way you can have the longer development cycle for better testing. > > Alright! > > Actually, reverting wasn't really necessary as the patches didn't > break anything, just that v1 did fix the complete range of the > problems. This late in the cycle, reverting is probably best :)