Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix ref->mutex deadlock in i915_active_wait()
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 07:15:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200410141508.GA2025@sultan-box.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410090838.GD1691838@kroah.com>

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:08:38AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 12:18:09AM -0700, Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> > From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> > 
> > The following deadlock exists in i915_active_wait() due to a double lock
> > on ref->mutex (call chain listed in order from top to bottom):
> >  i915_active_wait();
> >  mutex_lock_interruptible(&ref->mutex); <-- ref->mutex first acquired
> >  i915_active_request_retire();
> >  node_retire();
> >  active_retire();
> >  mutex_lock_nested(&ref->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); <-- DEADLOCK
> > 
> > Fix the deadlock by skipping the second ref->mutex lock when
> > active_retire() is called through i915_active_request_retire().
> > 
> > Note that this bug only affects 5.4 and has since been fixed in 5.5.
> > Normally, a backport of the fix from 5.5 would be in order, but the
> > patch set that fixes this deadlock involves massive changes that are
> > neither feasible nor desirable for backporting [1][2][3]. Therefore,
> > this small patch was made to address the deadlock specifically for 5.4.
> > 
> > [1] 274cbf20fd10 ("drm/i915: Push the i915_active.retire into a worker")
> > [2] 093b92287363 ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree")
> > [3] 750bde2fd4ff ("drm/i915: Serialise with remote retirement")
> > 
> > Fixes: 12c255b5dad1 ("drm/i915: Provide an i915_active.acquire callback")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.x
> > Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h |  4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Now queued up, thanks.
> 
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Thanks for queuing this! However, you queued the v1 version of the patch instead
of v2. Please pick the v2 version instead.

Thanks,
Sultan

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-10 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07  6:26 [PATCH 0/1] drm/i915: Fix a deadlock that only affects 5.4 Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-07  6:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Fix ref->mutex deadlock in i915_active_wait() Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-14  8:13   ` Chris Wilson
2020-04-14 14:52     ` Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-07  6:52 ` [PATCH 0/1] drm/i915: Fix a deadlock that only affects 5.4 Greg KH
2020-04-07  7:18   ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Fix ref->mutex deadlock in i915_active_wait() Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-07 20:32     ` [PATCH v3] " Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-10  9:08     ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2020-04-10 14:15       ` Sultan Alsawaf [this message]
2020-04-10 14:17       ` Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-11 11:39         ` Greg KH
2020-04-14  8:15           ` Chris Wilson
2020-04-14  8:23             ` Greg KH
2020-04-20  9:02               ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-04-20 15:42                 ` Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-21  8:04                   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-04-21 16:38                     ` Sultan Alsawaf
2020-04-21 20:55                       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-04-14 14:35             ` Sultan Alsawaf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200410141508.GA2025@sultan-box.localdomain \
    --to=sultan@kerneltoast.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox