From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828B2C2BA19 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531942072D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:12:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586859127; bh=hrv4v7Jt4rjXY8XDpLLFYQdJXTw1qD7wkIQHdPDy4gY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ZfaXxWrAAs8a2gtcHUQnn6TLFBUdj66uNkTPof/AnlqBag/JZ2VwDJz3ZgZIXDL25 uY0GSwEK3idcuhmQOH1qPxLEpJN+04r406ltEtyaiwlpWt4mSWNZofinVaiVeLu/qb M+1GjIv0vNVQs559pbccDUUKO/fBYlt45YfUSP94= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2438186AbgDNKMD (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:12:03 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46210 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2438130AbgDNKL7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:11:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31C772072D; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:11:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586859116; bh=hrv4v7Jt4rjXY8XDpLLFYQdJXTw1qD7wkIQHdPDy4gY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nx3ijwYi5SAGPPVbjzMSFoOLVqnQVr+6YoSec7RfUeDZNaJ+iiJY/BFThII6KAACp v/xSjaOu7CSOFEzh7dwMsax5a5zlaT4/axwC6MoC6JHzcji7S1Jc3BUlas9joWgkin e7KXdsE2Agxe2amSaOjZifJbSr0YBTGEliumwtDE= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:11:53 +0200 From: Greg KH To: "Schmid, Carsten" Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Patchset for CVE-2020-1749 Kernel 4.19 Message-ID: <20200414101153.GA37302@kroah.com> References: <1586262823357.14177@mentor.com> <20200411114450.GE2606747@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:05:09AM +0000, Schmid, Carsten wrote: > > > Applies to stable linux-v4.19.y (with y=114). > > > > Have you been able to test these patches so that you know they work? > > > I did apply and compile on x86 in both 4.14 and 4.19 (making sure to have all CONFIG_s set > to compile the changed code). > I then ran 4.14 (project kernel) on our target; however i can't build an > encrypted IPv6 tunnel to verify if the patchset helps. > (From the patch descriptions, it really looks like they fix this) > > IPv6 tunnel testing will be done by other folks in the project, i can't tell when due to > the CoVid situation as this requires special equipment that i can't access at all. Please wait to submit these until you can actually test that they solve the issue involved. > > And can you please send them as a patch series, not as attachments, and > > cc: all the original authors so that everyone can know what is going on > > and weigh in if they see any issues? > Of course. Sorry that i didn't do this yet. > > > > > And finally, do not change the changelog text from the original commits, > > that's not ok. > Except for the "upstream commit id", right? Correct. > > If you need to put any notes in there as to what you > > did, follow the format we have been using for years, and put it in the > > s-o-b: area in a small [ box ] > > > > Same for the 4.14 patches. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Of course i will do so, if it makes sense due to little testing effort possible. > Please give a short notice if you think i should resend the patch series. > > One question: > Our IT department adds a signature since a few days, after a line with "----". > Is this a problem? I can't turn that off, unfortunately. > (At least they keep the "text only" and don't switch to HTML) Is it a problem for what, patches? It shouldn't be. thanks, greg k-h