From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA2BC83001 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88242186A for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:41:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588228916; bh=X8gimk3yFAeK754Nb7O29n9XhkvBxvxg4SjVPsgNc2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=DGH44CX7MWkoHYbH1PKO9tSID7K5H9eQwEXxSAJFim1Nqb0ZO9REeO3p5QGDEfscC kDAPvWK8zI0lGDABnYUxGG7v1rO8PqrvcnlR3jlwD+Ic2SAMgMjzZQ6r5evKrkpFG0 ceh0nSWMEK1umZed4Q6003s0x3yWngIHAv9kgODU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726396AbgD3Gl4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:41:56 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47280 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726180AbgD3Glz (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 02:41:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8B5220784; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 06:41:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588228915; bh=X8gimk3yFAeK754Nb7O29n9XhkvBxvxg4SjVPsgNc2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=roKlYC4uPUs+R+tqgf43a/hneMSfmZSv4Lfp7+UBTdYwCJzx70fegoc2JrwU5IfVD Wz3M4FXcyD/MMWJt14Oga8bAFNgncpHXEnRu0PT/2rdzmA2gMZuxDDjSaoYAkfeRwj v4ZvQCeb1CMGGXu02GN/9dRaPbGZAWlo8FvFgA9s= Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:41:53 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable , John Stultz , Arnd Bergmann , Andrei Vagin , Thomas Gleixner , "X.f. Ren" , Michael Kerrisk , Marc Zyngier , Kuldeep Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.6 000/167] 5.6.8-rc1 review Message-ID: <20200430064153.GD2377651@kroah.com> References: <20200428182225.451225420@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 02:38:29PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 23:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.8 release. > > There are 167 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 30 Apr 2020 18:20:42 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.8-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Great, thanks fro testing these and letting me know. > NOTE: > This kernel panic seems to be platform specific. > However, I am sharing a few kernel panic logs here. > While running LTP cve[1] and libhugetlbfs[2] test suite on nxp ls2088 > device the kernel panic noticed with different kernel dump > and unfortunately it is not easily reproducible. > At this point it is unclear whether this problem > started happening from this stable rc review or not. > Because a different type of kernel panic noticed on Linus 's mainline tree > (5.7.0-rc2) version kernel while running LTP containers tests. If you end up narrowing this down to an offending commit, that would be great. thanks, greg k-h