stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
       [not found] <20200504135030.19210-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
@ 2020-05-04 13:50 ` Chris Wilson
  2020-05-06 23:42   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-05-04 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx
  Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, lionel.g.landwerlin, kenneth, Chris Wilson,
	stable

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could
correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the
common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset
handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are
allowed to run in parallel and not in strict succession. So for example
we do need to suspend one if the other hangs.

The real significance though is that this allows us to rearrange
groups of WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT linked requests along the single engine, and
so can resolve user level inter-batch scheduling dependencies from user
semaphores.

Fixes: c81471f5e95c ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c         | 9 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c         | 8 ++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c       | 4 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h       | 3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h | 1 +
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index d4ef344657b0..a47e4e15cbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1883,6 +1883,9 @@ static void defer_request(struct i915_request *rq, struct list_head * const pl)
 			struct i915_request *w =
 				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
 
+			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+				continue;
+
 			/* Leave semaphores spinning on the other engines */
 			if (w->engine != rq->engine)
 				continue;
@@ -2729,6 +2732,9 @@ static void __execlists_hold(struct i915_request *rq)
 			struct i915_request *w =
 				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
 
+			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+				continue;
+
 			/* Leave semaphores spinning on the other engines */
 			if (w->engine != rq->engine)
 				continue;
@@ -2853,6 +2859,9 @@ static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
 			struct i915_request *w =
 				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
 
+			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+				continue;
+
 			/* Propagate any change in error status */
 			if (rq->fence.error)
 				i915_request_set_error_once(w, rq->fence.error);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 22635bbabf06..95edc5523a01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1038,7 +1038,9 @@ i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (to->engine->schedule) {
-		ret = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, &from->sched);
+		ret = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched,
+						     &from->sched,
+						     0);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -1200,7 +1202,9 @@ __i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *to,
 
 	/* Couple the dependency tree for PI on this exposed to->fence */
 	if (to->engine->schedule) {
-		err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, &from->sched);
+		err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched,
+						     &from->sched,
+						     I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK);
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 37cfcf5b321b..5f4c1e49e974 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ bool __i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
 }
 
 int i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
-				   struct i915_sched_node *signal)
+				   struct i915_sched_node *signal,
+				   unsigned long flags)
 {
 	struct i915_dependency *dep;
 
@@ -473,6 +474,7 @@ int i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
 	local_bh_disable();
 
 	if (!__i915_sched_node_add_dependency(node, signal, dep,
+					      flags |
 					      I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL |
 					      I915_DEPENDENCY_ALLOC))
 		i915_dependency_free(dep);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
index d1dc4efef77b..6f0bf00fc569 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ bool __i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
 				      unsigned long flags);
 
 int i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
-				   struct i915_sched_node *signal);
+				   struct i915_sched_node *signal,
+				   unsigned long flags);
 
 void i915_sched_node_fini(struct i915_sched_node *node);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
index d18e70550054..7186875088a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct i915_dependency {
 	unsigned long flags;
 #define I915_DEPENDENCY_ALLOC		BIT(0)
 #define I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL	BIT(1)
+#define I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK		BIT(2)
 };
 
 #endif /* _I915_SCHEDULER_TYPES_H_ */
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
  2020-05-04 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency Chris Wilson
@ 2020-05-06 23:42   ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-05-06 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
  Cc: tvrtko.ursulin, lionel.g.landwerlin, Tvrtko Ursulin, stable

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: c81471f5e95c ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.10.

v5.6.10: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    8e9f84cf5cac ("drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-06 23:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200504135030.19210-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2020-05-04 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency Chris Wilson
2020-05-06 23:42   ` Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).